Impacto de inversiones de alto riesgo para el mantenimiento del coeficiente de competitividad empresarial en la recuperación económica

Autores/as

  • Yadira Argota Pérez Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann Tacna, Perú.Escuela de Postgrado- Doctorante del programa de Administración
  • Ruperto Layme Uchochoque Universidad Nacional Jorge Basadre Grohmann Tacna, Perú.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24039/rcv20251311888

Palabras clave:

competitividad, estrategia empresarial, inversión, recuperación económica, riesgo

Resumen

El objetivo del estudio fue determinar el impacto de inversiones de alto riesgo mediante el coeficiente de competitividad empresarial 3CA en la recuperación económica. Con un enfoque cuantitativo y descriptivo, se utilizaron encuestas validadas (α de Cronbach) y softwares 3CA y CAPROR para analizar competitividad y recuperación económica, además de una fórmula sobre el Índice de predicción de Riesgo y Quieta. Los resultados mostraron una confiabilidad alfa de Cronbach de 0,71, lo que garantizó la consistencia interna. AMTAWI mostró un coeficiente de competitividad de 1,2 en 2023 y proyectó 1,4 para 2024; ACINOX pasó de 1,4 a 1,6, logrando niveles de excelencia, mientras que Imprenta Campos mantuvo un coeficiente de 0,9. El Índice de Riesgo indicó bajo riesgo para AMTAWI (0,012), medio para Imprenta Campos (0,014) y alto para ACINOX (0,021). Las inversiones representaron el 65% de la rentabilidad en AMTAWI, 91% en ACINOX y 33% en Imprenta Campos, con recuperaciones económicas de 47%, 3% y 26%, respectivamente. Las estrategias de inversión y adaptación demostraron ser clave para la estabilidad y recuperación económica. AMTAWI y ACINOX avanzaron hacia la excelencia, mientras que Imprenta Campos se mantuvo estable, destacando la importancia de equilibrar riesgos y mantener la prudencia. Se concluye que la competitividad y el riesgo empresarial son dinámicos, influenciados por factores internos y externos, siendo la adaptabilidad empresarial esencial ante las incertidumbres.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abba, Z., Balta, N., & Hart, P. (2022). A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 160, 112305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112305

Adomako, S., Abdelgawad, S., Ahsan, M., Amankwah, J., & Liedong, T. (2023). Nonmarket strategy in emerging markets: The link between SMEs’ corporate political activity, corporate social responsibility, and firm competitiveness. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113767

Barton, D. (2022). Recognising institutional context in simulating and generalising exchange values for monetary ecosystem accounts. One Ecosystem, 7, e85283. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.7.e85283

Cha, J., Park, K., Kim, H., & Hong, J. (2023). Crisis index prediction based on momentum theory and earnings downside risk theory: Focusing on South Korea’s energy industry. Energies, 16(5), 2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052153

Chen, D., Ye, J., & Ye, W. (2023). Interpretable selective learning in credit risk. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101940

Corvello, V., Felicetti, A., Troise, C., & et al. (2024). Betting on the future: how to build antifragility in innovative start-up companies. Review of Managerial Science, 18, 1101-1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00636-x

Donohue, I., Coscieme, L., Gellner, G., Yang, Q., Jackson, A., Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., & McCann, K. (2023). Accelerated economic recovery in countries powered by renewables. Ecological Economics, 212, 107916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107916

Franz, D., & Le, J. (2021). Technology advances, high-risk research, and a safe way forward. mBio, 12(5):e0237321. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02373-21

Gómez, R., Alvarez, A., Cuya, B., Arias, M., Campos, N., Juarez, L., Anderson, M., Aguila, S., & Yáñez, J. (2023). Product innovation, market intelligence and pricing capability as a competitive advantage in the international performance of startups: Case of Peru. Sustainability, 15(11), 8992. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118992

Heredia, J., Geldes, C., Kunc, M., & Flores, A. (2019). New approach to the innovation process in emerging economies: The manufacturing sector case in Chile and Peru. Technovation, 79, 35-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.012

Hristov, I., Camilli, R., Chirico, A., & Mechelli, A. (2022). The integration between enterprise risk management and performance management system: Managerial analysis and conceptual model to support strategic decision-making process. Production Planning & Control, 35(8), 842-855. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2022.2140086

Hsu, C., Chang, A., Zhang, T., Lin, W., & Liu, W. (2021). Deploying resilience enablers to mitigate risks in sustainable fashion supply chains. Sustainability, 13(5), 2943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052943

Huang, C., Baghersad, M., Behara, R., & Zobel, C. (2022). Optimal investment in prevention and recovery for mitigating epidemic risks. Risk Analysis, 42(1), 206-220.

James, N., Menzies, M., & Chin, K. (2022). Economic state classification and portfolio optimisation with application to stagflationary environments. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 164, 112664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112664

Kang, X., Wang, M., Lin, J., & et al. (2022). Trends and status in resources security, ecological stability, and sustainable development research: A systematic analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 50192-50207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19412-7

Le, S., & Sukhatme, N. (2020). Reaching for mediocrity: Competition and stagnation in pharmaceutical innovation. International Review of Law and Economics, 64, 105934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105934

López, V., Iglesias, S., & Fernández, E. (2020). Is sustainable performance explained by firm effect in small business? Sustainability, 12(23), 10028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310028

Noja, G., Buglea, A., Lala, I., & et al. (2021). The interplay between knowledge-based competitiveness, people’s good health and well-being: New empirical evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Quality & Quantity, 55, 441-466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01015-4

Nupehewa, S., Liyanage, S., Polkotuwa, D., Thiyagarajah, M., Jayathilaka, R., & Lokeshwara, A. (2022). More than just investment: Causality analysis between foreign direct investment and economic growth. PLoS ONE, 17(11), e0276621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276621

Prokopczuk, M., Stancu, A., & Symeonidis, L. (2019). The economic drivers of commodity market volatility. Journal of International Money and Finance, 98, 102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102063

Settembre, D., González, R., & Medina, S. (2021). Flexibility and resilience in corporate decision making: A new sustainability-based risk management system in uncertain times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl 2), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00277-7

Tiganasu, R., Pascariu, G., & Lupu, D. (2022). Competitiveness, fiscal policy and corruption: Evidence from central and eastern european countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(3), 667-698. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.020

Yin, H., Mohsin, M., Zhang, L., Qian, C., & Cai, Y. (2022). Accessing the impact of FDI goals on risk management strategy and management performance in the digital era: A case study of SMEs in China. Sustainability, 14(22), 14874. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214874

Zenghelis, D. (2021). Why sustainable, inclusive, and resilient investment makes for efficacious post-COVID medicine. WIREs Climate Change, 12, e708. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.708

Publicado

2025-05-23

Cómo citar

Argota Pérez, Y., & Layme Uchochoque, R. . (2025). Impacto de inversiones de alto riesgo para el mantenimiento del coeficiente de competitividad empresarial en la recuperación económica. Cátedra Villarreal, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24039/rcv20251311888

Número

Sección

Artículos Originales