Semantics in the factual interpretation of the approximate truth concept of the bioecotoximonitor.

Authors

  • George Argota-Pérez Centro de Investigaciones Avanzadas y Formación Superior en Educación, Salud y Medio Ambiente “AMTAWI”. Ica, Perú. - Grupo de investigación One Health-Una Salud, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2560-6749
  • José Alberto Iannacone Oliver Grupo de investigación One Health-Una Salud, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima. - Grupo de Investigación en Sostenibilidad Ambiental (GISA). Escuela Universitaria de Posgrado. Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal. Lima, Perú. 4Laboratorio de Parasitología. Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. Universidad Ricardo Palma (URP). Lima, Perú. - Laboratorio de Ecología y Biodiversidad Animal. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemática. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3699-4732
  • María Amparo Rodríguez-Santiago 2Grupo de investigación One Health-Una Salud, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima. 3Grupo de Investigación en Sostenibilidad Ambiental (GISA). Escuela Universitaria de Posgrado. Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal. Lima, Perú. 4Laboratorio de Parasitología. Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. Universidad Ricardo Palma (URP). Lima, Perú. jose.iannacone@urp.edu.pe 5Laboratorio de Ecología y Biodiversidad Animal. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemática. 6Consejo Nacional de Ciencia de Humanidades, Ciencia y Tecnología “CONAHCYT”. Ciudad de México, México. - Laboratorio Ambiental de Parasitología, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma del Carmen “UNACAR”. Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0616-237X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62429/rnh20241811770

Keywords:

approximate truth, bioecotoximonitor, environmental conditions, environmental management, factual interpretation

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the semantics in the factual interpretation of the concept of approximate truth of the bioecotoximonitor. The transformation of the biomonitor to the quality of bioecotoximonitor was considered for analysis, along with the monist, pluralist, and instrumentalist distinction during bioassessment with the bioecotoximonitor. Five criteria were indicated: environmental conditions, data interpretation, interpretation consistency, environmental variability impact, and applicability in bioassessment. The factual interpretation of the bioecotoximonitor, through five criteria, evaluates the understanding of truth in environmental systems. It emphasizes the importance of considering environmental conditions and flexible data interpretation. The structured criteria address from collection to practical application in environmental management, ensuring the relevance and applicability of the information collected in specific environmental contexts. It is concluded that semantic criteria structure the factual interpretation of approximate truth where considering environmental conditions ensures result relevance, and interpretation from multiple perspectives is crucial for precise understanding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-05-16

How to Cite

Argota-Pérez, G. ., Iannacone Oliver, J. A., & Rodríguez-Santiago, M. A. . (2024). Semantics in the factual interpretation of the approximate truth concept of the bioecotoximonitor. Neotropical Helminthology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.62429/rnh20241811770