Feeling the risk, living the risk: women in
the maquiladoras in a border city in Mexico
Sintiéndose en riesgo, viviendo en riesgo: mujeres en las maquiladoras
Recibido: febrero 12 de 2019 | Revisado: mayo 15 de 2019 | Aceptado: junio 18 de 2019
Ulises Mendoza Arvizo1
Claudia Gómez García
Marie Leiner
ABSTRACT
In some parts of the world, women are exposed to atypical acts of
violence that include crimes due to war, terrorism, and community
violence. Another less prevalent type of violence, not often
studied due to its uniqueness, is unpunished female homicides in
high-crime cities. Women living under this unusual circumstance may
suffer a multitude of effects from “feeling at risk” as a result of
direct exposure to community violence and media exposure to female
homicide, and by “living the risk” from the effects of domestic
violence. These additional effects should be considered when
implementing preventive programs in high-crime cities.
Keywords: Fear of crime, maquiladoras, unsolved women
homicides
RESUMEN
En algunas partes del mundo, las mujeres están expuestas a casos atípicos
de violencia que incluyen crímenes debido a la guerra, el terrorismo o la
violencia comunitaria. Otros tipos menos comunes de exposición a la
violencia, incluyen homicidios de mujeres sin resolver en ciudades con
alta criminalidad. Las mujeres que viven en estas circunstancias
pueden sufrir una multitud de efectos por
“sentirse en riesgo” por la violencia que prevalece, la impunidad
y las noticias acerca de los crímenes. De forma adicional, algunas de
ellas “están en riesgo” por los efectos de la violencia doméstica.
Palabras clave: Miedo a ser víctima del crimen,
maquiladoras, homicidios de mujeres sin resolver
1 Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Administración, Universidad
Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, México
marie.leiner@ttuhsc.edu
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24039/cv201971343
Cátedra Villarreal | Lima, Perú | V. 7 | N. 1 | Enero - Junio | 2019 | e-ISSN 2311-2212 7
Background
Domestic violence in developing countries has evolved
from an issue of relative obscurity to one of primary
concern in the last few deca- des (Miller, 2005; Nasir &
Hyder, 2003; Wenzel, Monson, & Johnson, 2004).
Although women in developing countries experience
several types of violence, domestic violence is the most
stu- died because of its pervasiveness (Stover, 2005;
Waltermaurer, Butsashvili, Avaliani, Samuels, & McNutt,
2013). Other types of violence are not evenly distributed
across all neighborhoods and/or demographic groups and,
in some se- ttings, women are exposed to short- or long-
term atypical acts of violence (Asai & Arnold, 2003; Carli,
Telion, & Baker, 2003; Gracia & Tomas, 2014; Kennedy,
Charlesworth, & Chen, 2004; Pain, 2014; Vlahov et al.,
2002). Most of the available studies about this uncommon
ex- posure have concentrated on the women and children
affected by violent crime in the society due to war,
terrorism, community violence, and fear of crime
(Aisenberg & Ell, 2005; Cox, John- son, & Coyle, 2015;
Nicolaidis, Curry, McFar- land, & Gerrity, 2004; Wong,
Shumway, Flentje, & Riley, 2016).
If we consider that these exposures to violen- ce are not
independent but instead interlinked, it will be helpful to
determine if there is a relationship between women who
feel at risk and women who actually are victimized in an
abu- sive relationship, and are thus, “living the risk”. The
significance of this association will help to understand
1) the emotional layers covering an abusive relationship 2)
a tangible association between feeling at risk and living
the risk (iden- tified by questioning the effect of
feeling at risk because it has less stigma associated with
it) and 3) the possibility that the appropriate interven-
tion may reduce the effects of feeling at risk and help
women to gain understanding of problems involving
abusive relationships.
In addition, the collection of data about this
uncommon exposure offers an opportunity to study
the consequences of victimization and fear of crime on
people’s lives, which have reported debated results
(Evans, Fyfe, & Herbert, 1992; Fox, Nobles, & Piquero,
2009; Golant, 1984; Krulichová, 2018; Low &
Espelage, 2014; May, Vartanian, & Virgo, 2002). For
example, some criminologists report that this fear is
irrational and that those most likely to be victimized are
least afraid, and viceversa (Faramarzi, Esmailzadeh, &
Mosavi, 2005; Maxfield, 1984; Smith, 1985; Tran,
Nguyen, & Fisher, 2016; Young, 1988a).
During a visit of the Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights in 2003 to Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua,
Mexico, the authorities presented information about the
killings of 268 women and girls since 1993 (IACHR,
2003). Most of the victims were young women or girls,
workers in the maquiladoras, or maquilas (Mexican
assembly plants/export-processing factories), who were
sexually abused before being brutally killed. The
authorities reported that more than 250 missing person
reports filed during that period remained unsolved.
Representatives of the civil society presented a letter
signed by 5,000 individuals who demanded an
effective response to the situation. The letter
expressed that women living in this city since 1993 have
been afraid to walk the distance between their homes and
their jobs. Since 2003, the number of unsolved murders of
women has increased, and the city has been recognized
worldwide for its maquiladoras, unpunished killings, drug
cartels, and pollution (Ensalaco, 2006B; Livingston, 2004;
Márquez-Vargas, 2017; Pantaleo, 2010).
In this study, we explored the relationship between
feeling at risk and living the risk (victims of abusive
relationships) in two groups of women living in Ciudad
Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico. Women living in this city are
exposed to information about hundreds of unpunished
female homicides. We compared women’s fear of crime
between two different groups of working women: 1)
maquiladora workers (Maquiladora group), who have been
the main target of these homicides and 2) college students
(College group).
In order to define more fully this psychological
distress, we examined risk factors associated with
present/past exposure to domestic violence. Those
who were, or had been, victims of domestic violence
had significantly greater fear of becoming victims of
homicide. In addition, working for assembling plants
significantly increased the women’s fear of
becoming victims of crime. victims of crime.
Method
Study design
This study involved a convenient cross-sectional sample
of 716 women workers (ages 17 to 45), living in Ciudad
Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico. The women came from two
different groups: 502 Women working in the maquiladora,
and 214 college students working in non-maquiladora
industries. The occupations of the participants classified
as operators and non-operators
(non-professional/ semiprofessional jobs). The sample
of maquiladora workers was collected from seven
different organizations using a self-response questionnaire
while workers were on break or at lunch outside of the work
place. The college students were interviewed during
their attendance at the state University. Participation
was voluntary, and the internal review board (IRB) of
the University approved the study. Business students
collected the information as part of a larger class project
during their last semester in the University of Ciudad
Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico (UACJ).
Study setting and population
Ciudad Juarez is located on the border of the United
States and shares with its neighbor in the United States
(El Paso, Texas) the largest metropolitan area on the
border between Mexico and the United States. This city
has many maquiladoras that are owned by foreign
(usually United States) capital. They were first
established in 1965 on Mexico’s northern border.
These companies usually employ low-paid young
Mexican workers to assemble U.S. produced parts into
goods to be sold on the U.S. market. Ciudad Juarez
contains one of the largest concentrations of
maquiladora workers in the country.
Many of the maquiladora workers are migrants from
the north, center, or south of Mexico who move to
Ciudad Juarez. Moving from extreme poverty in their
original habitat, these women move to Ciudad Juarez
where they pool their resources to live together, with
relatives, or with friends of their family.
Questionnaire
The questionnaire used in this study was a modification
of a questionnaire used by Wenzel et. al., (Wenzel
et al., 2004). The modified questionnaire included
demographic information and six questions related to
exposure to violence. The questionnaire covered
key areas of present physical abuse, threats, and
harassment, as well as a history of abuse in the three
areas. In addition, the questionnaire examined fear of
crime (only violent crime was included)
Questions included:
Present abuse or aggression:
Emotional abuse (non-physical abuse):
Are you in a relationship where a person
offends you continuously? (e.g., calls you names,
insults you, but does not physically hurt you).
Physical abuse question:
Are you in a relationship with a person that
physically hurts you? (e.g., slaps, hits, punches,
kicks, pushes, rapes or other violent acts)
Threat question - included intimidation
or threats:
Are you in a relationship with a person who threatens
you? (e.g., threatens you, your children, your family,
your friends, or your property or that of others)
Harassment question included power and
control dynamics, such as the use of
economic power and isolation to control:
Are you in a relationship with a person who harasses
or controls you against your will? (e.g., controls
your access to money or transportation, isolates you
from family or friends, interferes with your job, etc.)
Past abuse or aggression:
In the past, have you ever been in a relationship with
a person who has done any of the things mentioned
in the above questions?
Feeling at risk:
Do you feel that you can become a victim of violent
acts (murder, attempted murder, or physical
victimization including severe injuries)?
Data analysis
Summary statistics included frequency tables for
categorical variables. Binary logistic regression was
used to measure associations between feeling at risk for
demographic variables, nd present/past exposure to
domestic violence.
Cátedra Villarreal | Lima, Perú | V. 7 | N. 1 | Enero - Junio | 2019 | e-ISSN 2311-2212 9
Results
Of the 716 working women who participated in this
study, 70% (502) worked in the maquiladora and 30%
(214) were college students working in non-maquiladora
industries. See Table 1 for descriptive statistics and results of
comparative tests. Compared to women
working in the maquiladoras, college students were
significantly younger and more likely to work in
semi-professional jobs. The College group women
felt at risk of being victims of acts of violence, 58
(27.1%) and Maquiladora group 172 (34.3%).
Tabla 1
The characteristics of the study sample (n = 716)
Maquiladora
Women N (%)
College
Women N (%)
Total (%)
Age
17-26
164 (32.7)
160 (74.8)
324 (45.3)
27-36
178 (35.5)
44 (20.6)
222 (31.0)
= or > 37
160 (31.9)
10 (4.7)
170 (23.7)
Total
502 (100.0)
214 (100.0)
716 (100.0)
Occupation
Semiprofessional
72 (14.3)
101 (47.2)
173 (24.2)
Unskilled Manual
430 (85.6)
113 (52.8)
543 (75.8)
Total
502 (100.0)
214 (100.0)
716 (100.0)
To investigate whether the College group and the
Maquiladora group differ on feeling at risk or not, a
chi square statistic was used. Pearson Chi square results
indicate that the College group and Maquiladora group
were not significantly different on whether they feel at
risk (X2= 3.5, df=1, N=716, p=0.06). Phi, which indicates
the strength of the association between the two
variables, is 0.07 and, thus, the effect size was
considered smaller than typical according to Cohen
(Cohen, 1988). Reports of feeling at risk, current abuse,
and history of abuse, were significant (Table 2).
Tabla2
Percentage of women reporting feeling at risk: College women and Maquiladora
Maquiladora
College
p
Women N (%)
Women N (%)
Group
172
(34.3)
58 (27.1)
0.06
Current Abuse
Physical
148
(30.3)
49 (22.9)
0.05
Threats
64 (13.0)
48 (22.4)
<.001
Harassment
21
(4.3)
12 (5.6)
NS
History of Abuse
Physical, threats or/and
harassment
98 (20.1)
59 (12.5)
<.001
10 Cátedra Villarreal | Lima, Perú | V. 7 | N. 1 | Enero - Junio | 2019 | e-ISSN 2311-2212
Unadjusted odds ratios indicate significant differences
with regard to feeling at risk and current abuse: physical
abuse OR = 2.6 CI (1.8-3.6) p<.001; threats OR = 2.5 CI (1.7-
3.8) p<.001; and harassment OR=3.4 CI (1.7-7.0)
p<.001. History of abuse was also significant OR=3.4
CI (2.3-5.0) p<.001. Feeling at risk between groups was
borderline OR=1.4 CI (1.0-2.0) p=0.06 (Ta- ble 3).
Tabla 3
Women reporting feeling at risk and exposure to abuse/aggression
Group
Current Abuse
Unadjusted Odds Ratio
p
(CI)
1.4 (1.0-2.0)
NS
Physically hurt including slaps, hits, punches,
2.6 (1.8-3.6)
<.001
licks, pushes, rapes, or anything else
Threats toward you, your children, your
2.5 (1.7-3.8)
<.001
family, your property, or any others
Harassment including control of money,
transportation, isolates you from family or
3.4 (1.7-7.2)
<.001
friends, interferes with your job
History of abuse
Including physical, threats or harassment
3.4 (2.3-5.0)
<.001
A logistic regression analysis was conducted with fear of
crime as the dependent variable and group, age, occupation,
education, and present/ past history of domestic abuse as
predictor variables. With a total of 697 cases analyzed, the
full model was significantly reliable (chi square 84.9, df =
9 p<.0001). This model accounted for between 11.5% and
the 16% of the variance of fear of crime, with 91.1% of the
women not feeling fear of crime successfully predicted and
28.6% successfully predicted.
Overall 70.7% of predictions were accurate. Table 4 gives
coefficients and the Wald statistic and probability
values for each of the predictor variables. The results
show that group, present physical abuse, threats, and past
abuse reliably predicted fear of crime. The values of
the coe-fficients reveal that each unit (present
physical abuse, threats, and past abuse) increase in group
Maquiladora vs. College students is associated with an
increase in the odds of fear of crime by a factor of 1.77,
2.5, 2.8, and 2.6, respectively.
Discussion
Violence against women occurs within and across all
socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic regions
of the world (Babu & Kar, 2009; Renzetti, 1994). Some
conditions exacerbate the exposure to violence against
women and include life stressors; community violence;
or unusual conditions due to war, terrorist attacks, or
unsolved female murders.
Many of the dynamics related to domestic violence
that trap women in violent relationships cross
boundaries that include political, socioeconomic,
demographic, or geographic perspectives. These
dynamics include societal and community attitudes
toward violence, isolation, fear of exposure, lack of
resources to facilitate help to women and children
victims of violence, and lack of sufficient
accessible services for victims of violence. The
impact of violence is seldom studied in the context of
other risk factors of mental distress, and fear of being a
victim of violence from living in a higher risk area.
This study examined the relationship between the fear
of becoming a victim of violence and the exposure to
present and past acts of violence and aggression
adjusting for demographic and social characteristics.
Cátedra Villarreal | Lima, Perú | V. 7 | N. 1 | Enero - Junio | 2019 | e-ISSN 2311-2212 11
Tabla 4
Multiple logistic regression models predicting feeling at risk
Adjusted Odds Ratio (CI)
p
Group (Women College students vs.
1.8(1.1-3.2)
0.03
Women maquiladora
Occupation
Semiprofessional jobs
1.0
Non-professional
0.9(0.6-1.6)
0.8
Age (per 10 year incremental increase)
1.0(0.9-1.0)
0.24
Education college vs. not college
1.0(0.8-1.3)
0.81
Current Abuse
Physically hurt including slaps, hits,
punches, licks, pushes, rapes, or anything
3.1(1.2-8.2)
0.02
else
Threats toward you, your children, your
2.0(0.7-5.7)
0.22
family, your property, or any others
Harassment including control of money,
transportation, isolates you from family
1.2 (0.5-2.9)
0.66
or friends, interferes with your job
History of abuse
Including physical, threats or harassment
3.0 (1.9-4.8)
<.001
Feeling at risk seems to be associated with living the
risk. The results suggested that a high percentage of
women 32.1% from both different groups felt at risk
(fear of crime), which may be a natural response to
the conditions that prevail in the city. However,
after adjustment by group, and past/present history of
violence, women in the Maquiladora group felt more at
risk of becoming a victim of violent crime. In addition,
women that were present/past victims of violence felt
more at risk in general. Given the fact that the trauma
caused by domestic violence may also involve
cumulative effects of other traumas (e.g. previous
child victimization, previous battering, etc.), it is
necessary to consider that these women lived in fear,
which is very distressful.
Violence has long been considered as a threat to the
health of women, a stressful experience that requires
psychological adaptation, and an experience that may
give rise to psychological consequences (Modi, Palmer,
& Armstrong, 2014; Sorenson & Saftlas, 1994).
All women who participated in this study were workers,
who may be helped with programs that target the effects
of the exposure to violence in the city. By addressing this
issue, there is a high probability of benefit to women
that are present or past victims of domestic violence.
Feeling at risk of violence may be exacerbated by
incidents that have occurred in the past years in Ciudad
Juarez, as well as the attention the media gives to the
events. After the attention lessens, these women
have to live in a city that is known for its maquiladoras,
unpunished killings, drug cartels, and pollution
(Ensalaco, 2006A; Livingston, 2004; Márquez-Vargas,
2017; Pantaleo, 2010).
Maquiladoras benefit from the work of these
women and have historically promoted educational and
training programs that can very easily be
diversified to also empower them. All these
maquiladoras have staff nurses that have or can
acquire training to implement programs that increase
women’s personal strengths and inner resources.
12 Cátedra Villarreal | Lima, Perú | V. 7 | N. 1 | Enero - Junio | 2019 | e-ISSN 2311-2212
Women who suffer from problems caused by of
the fear of violence in the city can benefit greatly from
educational, preventive programs at work. In addition,
these programs enable easier recognition of the victims due
to the impersonal nature of accepting feeling at risk instead
of accepting to be a victim of domestic violence.
There are some limitations to this study de-
rived from the questionnaire used to collect the
information. Detection of present domestic violence is
usually underestimated using questionnaires, thus, there
is a possibility that the risk found is even greater than
that shown.
Acknowledgements
We thank the students of the Autonomous University of
Ciudad Juarez for their interest on the women living in
Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico.
References
Aisenberg, E., & Ell, K. (2005). Contextualizing
community violence and its effects: an
ecological model of parent-child interdependent
coping. J Interpers Violence, 20(7), 855-871.
Asai, Y., & Arnold, J. L. (2003). Terrorism in Japan.
Prehospital Disaster Med, 18(2), 106- 114.
Babu, B. V., & Kar, S. K. (2009). Domestic violence
against women in eastern India: a population-
based study on prevalence and related issues.
BMC Public Health, 9, 129. doi:
10.1186/1471-2458-9-129
Carli, P., Telion, C., & Baker, D. (2003). Terrorism in
France. Prehospital Disaster Med, 18(2), 92-99.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power and analysis for
the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Cox, C. B., Johnson, J., & Coyle, T. (2015). Coping
tyles moderate the relationships between
exposure to community violence and work-
related outcomes. J Occup Health Psychol,
20(3), 348-358. doi:10.1037/ a0038556
Ensalaco, M. (2006a). Murder in Ciudad Juarez: A
parable of women's struggle for human rights.
Violence Against Women, 12(5), 417-440.
doi:10.1177/1077801206287963
Ensalaco, M. (2006b). Murder in Ciudad Juarez: A
parable of women's struggle for human rights.
Violence Against Women, 12(5), 417-440.
doi:10.1177/1077801206287963
Evans, D. J., Fyfe, N. R., & Herbert, D. T. (1992).
Crime, Policing, and Place: Essays in
Environmental Criminology Routledge.
Faramarzi, M., Esmailzadeh, S., & Mosavi, S. (2005). A
comparison of abused and non-abused women's
definitions of domestic violence and
attitudes to acceptance of male dominance. Eur
J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 122(2), 225-
231. doi:10.1016/j. ejogrb.2004.11.047
Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Piquero, A. R. (2009). Gender,
crime victimization and fear of crime. Security
Journal, 22(1), 24- 39. doi: 10.1057/sj.2008.13
Golant, S. M. (1984). Factors influencing the
nighttime activity of old persons in their
community. J Gerontol, 39(4), 485-491.
Gracia, E., & Tomas, J. M. (2014). Correlates of victim-
blaming attitudes regarding partner violence
against women among the Spanish general
population. Violence Against Women, 20(1),
26-41. doi:10.1177/1077801213520577
IACHR. (2003). The situation of the rights of women in Ciudad
Juarez, Mexico: the right to be free from violence and
discrimination. Retrieved 7 march 2003, from http://
www.cidh.org/annualrep/2002eng/chap.vi.juarez.htm
Kennedy, C., Charlesworth, A., & Chen, J. L. (2004).
Disaster at a distance: impact of 9.11.01
televised news coverage on mothers' and
children's health. J Pediatr Nurs, 19(5), 329-339.
Krulichová, E. (2018). Life satisfaction and happiness:
discussing the impact of fear of crime and
victimization. Auc Philosophica Et Historica,
2018(2), 23-37. doi:10.14712/24647055.2018.2
Livingston, J. (2004). Murder in Juárez: Gender, Sexual
Violence, and the Global Assembly Line Frontiers: A
Journal of Women Studies, 25(1), 59-76
Low, S., & Espelage, D. (2014). Conduits from community
violence exposure to peer aggression and
victimization: contributions of parental monitoring,
impulsivity, and deviancy. J Couns Psychol, 61(2),
221-231. doi: 10.1037/a0035207
Cátedra Villarreal | Lima, Perú | V. 7 | N. 1 | Enero - Junio | 2019 | e-ISSN 2311-2212 13
Márquez-Vargas, P. M., Méndez-Ruiz, M.D., Villegas-
Pantoja, M.A., Cadena Santos, F. (2017).
Intimate partner violence in women workers of
Maquiladoras of Nuevo Laredo, Mexico.
Horizontes de Enfermería, 28(2), 25-37.
Maxfield, M. G. (1984). Fear of Crime in England
and Wales. London: HMSO.: Home Office
Research Study 78.
May, D. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Virgo, K. (2002).
The impact of parental attachment and
supervision on fear of crime among adolescent
males. Adolescence, 37(146), 267-287.
Miller, G. (2005). Poor countries, added perils for
women. Science, 308(5728), 1576.
Modi, M. N., Palmer, S., & Armstrong, A. (2014).
The role of Violence Against Women Act in
addressing intimate partner violence: a public
health issue. J Womens Health (Larchmt),
23(3), 253-259. doi:10.1089/jwh.2013.4387
Nasir, K., & Hyder, A. A. (2003). Violence against pregnant
women in developing countries: review of
evidence. Eur J Public Health, 13(2), 105-107
Nicolaidis, C., Curry, M., McFarland, B., & Gerrity, .
(2004). Violence, mental health, and physical
symptoms in an academic internal medicine
practice. J Gen Intern Med, 19(8), 819-827.
Pain, R. (2014). Everyday terrorism. Progress
in Human Geography, 38(4), 531-550.
doi:10.1177/0309132513512231.
Pantaleo, K. (2010). Gendered Violence: An
Analysis of the Maquiladora Murders.
International Criminal Justice Review, 20(4),
349-365. doi:10.1177/1057567710380914
Renzetti, C. M. (1994). On dancing with a bear: reflections
on some of the current debates among domestic violence
theorists. Violence Vict, 9(2), 195-200.
Smith, S. J. (1985). News and dissemination of fear. In J.
Burgess & J. Gold (Eds.), Geography, the Media
and Popular Culture. London: Croom Helm.
Sorenson, S. B., & Saftlas, A. F. (1994). Violence
and women’s health. The role of
epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol, 4(2), 140-145.
Stover, C. S. (2005). Domestic violence research:
what have we learned and where do we go from
here? J Interpers Violence, 20(4), 448-454.
Tran, T. D., Nguyen, H., & Fisher, J. (2016). Attitudes
towards Intimate Partner Violence against
Women among Women and Men in 39 Low- and
Middle-Income Countries. PLoS One, 11(11).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167438
Vlahov, D., Galea, S., Resnick, H., Ahern, J.,
Boscarino, J. A., Bucuvalas, M., . . . Kilpatrick,
D. (2002). Increased use of cigarettes, alcohol,
and marijuana among Manhattan, New York,
residents after the September 11th terrorist
attacks. Am J Epidemiol, 155(11), 988-996.
Waltermaurer, E., Butsashvili, M., Avaliani, N.,
Samuels, S., & McNutt, L.-A. (2013). An
examination of domestic partner violence and
its justification in the Republic of Georgia.
BmC Women´s Health, 13(44).
Wenzel, J. D., Monson, C. L., & Johnson, S. M. 2004).
Domestic violence: prevalence and
detection in a family medicine residency clinic.
J Am Osteopath Assoc, 104(6), 233-239.
Wong, L. H., Shumway, M., Flentje, A., & Riley, E. D.
(2016). Multiple Types of Childhood and Adult
Violence Among Homeless and Unstably
Housed Women in San Francisco. Violence and
Victims, 31(6), 1171-1182. doi:
10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-15-00132
Young, J. (1988a). Risk of crime and fear of crime: a
realist critique of survey-based assumptions:
Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
14 Cátedra Villarreal | Lima, Perú | V. 7 | N. 1 | Enero - Junio | 2019 | e-ISSN 2311-2212