Barlow’s corpora analysis as an ESAP reading comprehension strategy
After needs analysis has been worked out to
match English learners’ needs by curriculum
designers, some differentiated perspectives deal-
ing with the lingua franca at the academic and
professional levels have come up. Currently, it is
commonly heard of programs such as English for
Specific Purposes (ESP), English for Academic
Purposes (EAP), and a third one that deals with
both, English for Specific and Academic Purpos-es
(ESAP). The development of these programs are
run by educational institutions with the hope that
“ELT professionals can contribute to the
development of a nation by training its citizens in
the academic and professional English that people
need in order to acquire knowledge and generate
improvements” (Orr, 2013, p. 2).
Saville-Troike has found that English commu-
nicative competence is associated with the knowl-
edge needed for its use. She acknowledges that
“L1 competence ideally involves the broad rep-
ertoire of knowledge which people need to com-
municate appropriately for many purposes within
their native language community” (2012, p. 135).
In other words, mother tongue knowledge fulfills a
range of communicative purposes that emerge in
authentic and spontaneous daily life situations. If
this is so, what is then the role of a second or a
foreign language in a speech community?
With the unavoidably events of techno-
logical, scientific and medical advances, the
necessity for acquiring or learning (according
to Krashen’s hypotheses, but the terms will be
used interchangeably here) an additional
language is critical. Since cutting-edge chang-
es and innovations come mostly from En-
glish-speaking countries, English has become
the additional language for a great number of
speakers all over the world while for others it
represents a second language. Some clari-
fication needs to be made in this respect. For
Saville-Troike (2012, p.2), “Second Language
Acquisition (SLA) refers to both the study of
individuals and groups who are learning a lan-
guage subsequent to their mother tongue. The
additional language is called a second
language (L2), even though it may actually be
the third, fourth, or tenth to be acquired”.
On the other hand, the additional language
may be acquired/learned in informal or formal
settings; that is, either in natural places where
the language is the main source of communi-
cation or in instructional places such as class-
rooms with the help of an expert’s guidance.
“L2 competence is typically, perhaps unavoid-
ably, much more restricted, especially when
SLA takes place in a foreign language setting”
(p. 135). This is the case for Peru where En-
glish is learned as a foreign language.
Regarding the purposes for which a second
language is learned, there are “…between at
least two fundamental types of communica-
tive competence: academic competence and
interpersonal competence. Academic com-
petence would include the knowledge needed
by learners who want to use the L2 primari-ly
to learn about other subjects or as a tool in
scholarly research, or a medium in a specific
professional or occupational field” (pp. 135-
136). This also means that learners will con-
centrate in the learning of the specific vocabu-
lary of the field and on developing knowledge
that will enable them to read in a specific sub-
ject matter with acceptable fluency. This does
not necessarily mean that the other skills are
not at all relevant for the learner. The impor-
tance of the other skills will depend on the pri-
orities for which language should be used in
the particular community context: either for
academic purpose or professional purposes or
both. On the other hand, interpersonal com-
petence embodies other communicative pur-
poses that are by far adequate for face-to-face
familiar and friendship encounters. For the
subject matter of the current paper, “Develop-
ing L2 academic reading, listening, and writ-
ing proficiency, however, does not necessarily
require fluent speaking ability, particularly for
learners studying the L2 in a foreign language
context” (p. 136).
Through the table below, Saville-Troike
shows us how the importance of activities in
which the speaker will be involved depends
on the priorities that fall into “academic
versus interpersonal needs…” (p. 136).
| Cátedra Villarreal | V. 5 | No. 2 | julio-diciembre | 2017 | 221