47
Neotrop. Helminthol., 8(1), 2014
2014 Asociación Peruana de Helmintología e Invertebrados Afines (APHIA)
ISSN: 2218-6425 impreso / ISSN: 1995-1043 on line
ORIGINAL ARTICLE / ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL
MICROHABITAT PREFERENCE AND SEASONALITY OF GILL MONOGENEANS IN
NILE TILAPIA REARED IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL
PREFERENCIA DE MICROHÁBITAT Y ESTACIONALIDAD DE MONOGENEOS
BRANQUIALES DE LA TILAPIA DEL NILO CULTIVADA EN EL SURESTE DE BRASIL
Mauricio Laterça Martins, Ana Rosa Santana de Sá,
Gabriela Tomas Jerônimo, Karen Roberta Tancredo, Eduardo Luis Tavares Gonçalves,
Daniela Bampi, Giselle Mari Speck & Alexandre Mattos Sandin
Abstract
Few studies have been done to evaluate the monogenean microhabitat preference. This study
evaluated the monogenean distribution among different gill arches of Nile tilapia Oreochromis
niloticus and seasonality. A total of 89 fish were captured in a pond located in Chapecó, Santa
Catarina, for parasitological analysis. After fish euthanasia, the gill arches were removed,
separated from the most external to the most internal and named as I, II, III and IV. Transparency,
pH, oxygen, temperature, alkalinity, conductivity, ammonia, iron, orthophosphate, sulfide, nitrite
and nitrate of water pond were measured. In spring 2008 the mean abundances of the
monogeneans (Scutogyrus longicornis, Cychlidogyrus sclerosus, C. thurstonae and C. tilapiae) in
the arches I, II, III and IV were, respectively, 11.45, 14.45, 13.8, 13.15, in summer 2008 theywere
13.12, 12.25, 14.94, 21.53, in summer 2009 they were 2.75, 3.25, 2.45, 2.45, in autumn 2009 they
were 13.44, 18.78, 11.78, 9.22 and in winter 2009 they were 0.35, 0.5, 0.3, 0.5. Monogenean
preference for microhabitat in the gills of farmed Nile Tilapia was not observed. A significant
increase of parasites in spring and summer 2008 and autumn 2009 was observed. The highest
number of parasites coincided with seasons of high water temperature. The lack of microhabitat
preference among the gill arches suggest homogenous distribution of parasites combined with
water quality parameters.
Keywords: Oreochromis – monogenean parasites - gills - season.
Suggested citation: Martins, ML, Sá, ARS, Jerônimo, GT, Tancredo, KR, Gonçalves, ELT, Bampi, D, Speck, GM & Sandin, AM.
2014. Microhabitat preference and seasonality of gill monogenean in Nile Tilapia reared in southern Brazil. Neotropical
Helminthology, vol. 8, n°1, jan-jun, pp. 47 - 58.
AQUOS - Aquatic Organisms Health Laboratory, Aquaculture Department, CCA, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Rod. Admar Gonzaga 1346,
88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
E-mail: mauricio.martins@ufsc.br, anarosa.sa@gmail.com, gabrielatj@gmail.com, roberta.tancredo@gmail.com, eltgoncalves@gmail.com,
danielabampi@hotmail.com, giselle_speck@yahoo.com.br, alexandre_sandin@hotmail.com
Martins et al.
Microhabitat preference and seasonality of gill monogenean
48
Resumen
Palabras clave: branquias - estacion Oreochromis - parásitos.
Pocos estudios han sido hechos para evaluar la preferencia por el microhabitat de monogenea.
Este estudio evaluó la distribución y estacionalidad de monogenea entre los diferentes arcos
branquiales de tilapia del Nilo. Un total de 89 peces fueron capturados en una laguna en la ciudad
de Chapecó, Santa Catarina, para el análisis parasitológico. Después de la eutanasia de los peces,
fueron extraídos los arcos branquiales separadamente a partir de la región externa hasta la interna
y numerados como I, II, III e IV. Fueron evaluadas la transparencia del agua, el pH, el oxigeno
disuelto, la temperatura, la alcalinidad, la conductividad, el amonio, el hierro, el ortofosfato, el
sulfato, el nitrito y el nitrato. En la primavera de 2008 las abundancias promedio de monogenea
(Scutogyrus longicornis, Cychlidogyrus sclerosus, C. thurstonae y C. tilapiae) en los arcos I, II,
III y IV fueron, respectivamente, 11,45; 14,45; 13,8; 13,15; en el verano de 2008 de 13,12; 12,25;
14,94; 21,53; en el verano de 2009 de 2,75; 3,25; 2,45; 2,45; en el otoño de 2009 de 13,44; 18,78;
11,78; 9,22 y en el invierno de 2009 de 0,35; 0,5; 0,3; 0,5. No fue observada preferencia por
monogenea por el microhabitat en las branquias de la tilapia del Nilo en cultivo. Fue observado un
aumento significativo de los helmintos en la primavera y verano de 2008 y otoño de 2009. El
mayor número de parásitos coincidió con las estaciones de mayor temperatura del agua. La falta
de preferencia por microhabitat entre los arcos branquiales sugiere una distribución homogénea
de los parásitos combinados con los parámetros de calidad de agua.
culminates in disease outbreaks (Bergh, 2007).
Few studies relate the microhabitat preference of
fish parasites (Hanek & Fernando, 1978;
Buchmann, 1989; Oliva & Luque, 1998; Dzika,
1999; Ramasamy et al., 1985; Koskivaara et al.,
1992; Rubio-Godoy, 2008; Iannacone &
Alvariño, 2012).
In Brazil, few studies regarding the gill
microhabitat preference of parasites in farmed
fish are found. Jerônimo et al. (2013) have
reported higher mean intensity of the
monogeneans Mymarothecium viatorum
Boeger, Piasecki & Sobecka, 2002 and
Anacanthorus penilabiatus Boeger, Husak &
Martins, 1995 in the gill arch I than in the arch IV
of pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg,
1887) native farmed fish.
On this view, the aim of this work was to
evaluate the monogenean preference for gill
microhabitat in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis
niloticus Linnaeus 1758 (Cichlidae) reared in
ponds in Southern Brazil and its occurrence in
each season of the year.
Monogenean helminthes are among the major
parasites on Nile tilapia, even though in Brazil
there are few cases of mass mortalities caused by
high parasite number. They are responsible for
significant economical losses, especially when
present with both bacterial and parasitic
concurrent infections (Xu et al., 2007). Its
reproduction is favored by water quality,
stocking density and temperature (Moraes &
Martins, 2004). The parasite may inhabit and
live well adapted to the host with no mortality
outbreaks. On the other hand, if fish are exposed
to stressful conditions, disease can occur
(Buchmann & Bresciani, 1997).
According to Overstreet (1997), parasitological
data may act as indicator of fish welfare and
environmental health. Jerônimo et al. (2011)
have demonstrated the importance of fish
assessment in the different production systems.
They argued that water quality might influence
the number and diversity of fish ectoparasites.
Aquaculture improves the possibility of fish
parasite dissemination and sometimes it
INTRODUCTION
49
between seasons, monogenean counting data
were transformed to x and submitted to
factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Principal components analysis was also used as
an exploratory technique to assess relation
between seasons and every measured parameter.
All analysis were performed using StatSoft's
Statistica 7.0 software, using Bartlett's test to
verify homogeneity of variances and Tukey`s
test used for mean comparison.
The means and standard deviation of weight (g)
and total length (cm) were as follows: spring
2008 (357.5+97.4 and 27.2+2.3), summer 2008
(520.7+72.7 and 30.3+1.6), summer 2009
(110.1+32 and 20.6+1.8), autumn 2009
(152.2+95.3 and 22.1+3.5) and winter 2009
(251.6+51.2 and 23.8+1.8).
Almost all water quality parameters were
constant during the whole collection period
(Figure 1). As expected, the highest water
temperature was found in summer and depletion
of dissolved oxygen occurred in autumn. Water
transparency was between 20 and 30 cm as
measured with Secchi disc.
The monogenean helminthes were identified as
Scutogyrus longicornis Paperna et Thurston
1969, Cichlidogyrus sclerosus Paperna et
Thurston 1969, Cichlidogyrus thurstonae
Ergens 1981 and Cichlidogyrus tilapiae Paperna
1960.
Prevalence rate of parasitism of all monogenean
was high in all seasons, except in winter 2009
(Table 1). ANOVA data comparison showed no
difference (P>0.05) in monogenean intensity
between gill arches (Figure 2), despite of season,
indicating there was no microhabitat preference
in the current study. When gill arches were
compared among seasons (Figure 3),
significantly higher numbers of helminthes were
found in spring 2008, summer 2008 and autumn
2009. Factorial ANOVA showed no significant
interaction between seasons and gill arches
preference (Figure 4).
From spring 2008 to winter 2009, a total of 89
Nile tilapia were captured with nets in a fish
pond located in Chapecó in the State of Santa
Catarina, Southern Brazil (27° 5' 48” S and 52°
37' 7” W) for parasitological diagnosis. Fish
2
were kept in 2000 m earthen ponds at a stocking
2
density of 2 to 3 fish/m and fed twice a day with
commercial diet. In each season 20 fish were
examined, except in autumn 2009 when only 9
animals were captured. Parasitological analysis
was made in situ and fixed material was stored
and transported to the laboratory. In the
sampling day pH (Alfakit phmeter),
transparency (Secchi disc), dissolved oxygen
(Alfakit oxymeter at-150), water temperature,
electrical conductivity (PHTEK CD203),
alkalinity, ammonia, iron, ortophosphate,
sulfide, nitrite and nitrate (measured with
colorimetric kit Alfakit) of pond water were
measured in the morning and afternoon.
After anesthetizes in a benzocaine solution (75
-1
mg·L ) and euthanasia (Ethic Committee
number 23080.019034/2008-98/CEUA/UFSC),
smears of the gill filaments were examined
under microscope between a glass slide and a
cover slip (Jerônimo et al., 2011). Gill arches
were carefully separated from the most external
to the most internal, named as I, II, III and IV,
o
embedded into 60 C hot water to relax parasites
and fixed in 5% formalin solution for further
quantification in the laboratory using marked
Petri dishes. The parasites were mounted using
the Hoyer's method for identification through
the esclerotized parts of the parasites (Kritsky et
al., 1995; Eiras, 1994) and identified according
to Paperna & Thurston (1969), Ergens (1981),
Douëllou (1993), Pariselle & Euzet (1995) and
Pariselle et al. (2003). The monogeneans are
deposited in the Laboratory AQUOS, Santa
Catarina, Brazil collection under the numbers
ARS 1-5. The data of prevalence, mean intensity
and mean abundance for all monogenean joined
were calculated as suggested by Bush et al.
(1997).
In order to evaluate microhabitat preference
among gill arches and differences in parasitism
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Neotrop. Helminthol., 8(1), 2014
RESULTS
50
Martins et al.
Microhabitat preference and seasonality of gill monogenean
relation between sulfide and nitrite, opposed to
water temperature and monogenean as well as
relation between transparency and dissolved
oxygen, opposed to conductivity. All toxic
components, ammonia, nitrite, nitrate and
sulfide, grouped in the same region of axis.
Regarding seasons, summer 2008 and spring
2008 were more related with monogenean and
water temperature, while summer 2009 was
related to toxic components and autumn 2009 to
transparency and dissolved oxygen.
Both prevalence and number of parasites were
lower (P<0.05) in winter than that observed in
the other seasons (Figure 3). Despite the high
prevalence rate in summer 2009 (89%) mean
intensity and mean abundance showed low
values (3.1 and 2.7, respectively).
In the principal components analysis (Figure 5 a-
b), the score and loading plots summarizes data
influence over two factors, also called principal
components (PC), which represent 71.81% of
variance among samples. It shows a strong
Water Temperature (
°
C)
pH
Transparency (cm)
Ammonia (mg/L)
Nitrite (mg/L)
Nitrate (mg/L)
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)
Sulfide (mg/L)
Conductivity (µS/cm)
Orthophosphate (mg/L)
Iron (mg/L)
Spring 2008
20.15
6.63
20
0.1
0
0.05
3.985
0
78
0.75
0.75
Summer 2008
26.9
7.375
20
1
0
0
8.665
0
74
0
0
Summer 2009
19.05
8.45
22.5
1.025
0.03
0.85
0
0.025
79
0.75
0.25
Autumn 2009
20.45
7.2
27.5
0.45
0.03
0.4
20
0.025
19
0.75
0.9
Winter 2009
12. 6
6.965
22.5
0.1
0.005
1 .035
10.655
0.0125
1 .25
0.5
Figure 1. Water quality parameters from the pond in Chapecó, Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil.
Table 1. Parasitological indexes of Oreochromis niloticus cultured in Chapecó. Santa Catarina State. Southern
Brazil, along the seasons and in each gill arch. IG: infected gills, EG: examined gills, IF: infected fish, EF: examined
fish.
Seasons IG/EG P (%) Mean Intensity Mean Abundance
Spring 2008 80/80 100 13.2+11.2 13.2+11.2
Summer 2008 79/80 98 15.5+10.0 15.7+9.9
Summer 2009 71/80 89 3.1+1.8 2.7+1.9
Autumn 2009 35/36 97 13.7+9.6 13.3+9.7
Winter 2009 24/80 30 1.4+0.6 0.4+0.7
Gill arches IF/EF P (%) Mean Intensity Mean Abundance
Arch 1 71/89 80 9.8+8.3 7.8+8.4
Arch 2 74/89 83 10.5+10.3 8.7+10.1
Arch 3 69/89 77 10.7+8.9 8.2+9.0
Arch 4 75/89 84 10.9+12.8 9.2+12.4
51
Neotrop. Helminthol., 8(1), 2014
Figure 2. ANOVA comparison of transformed ( x ) Monogenean count data between gill arches of Oreochromis niloticus
cultured in Chapecó, Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil.
Figure 3. ANOVA comparison of transformed ( x ) Monogenoidea count data between seasons in Chapecó, Santa Catarina
State, Southern Brazil.
52
Martins et al.
Microhabitat preference and seasonality of gill monogenean
Figure 4. Factorial ANOVA comparison of transformed ( x ) Monogenean count data between seasons and gill arches of
Oreochromis niloticus cultured in Chapecó, Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil.
Water temperature, which presents an important
role in fish development by influencing directly
its metabolic rates and also, several times,
influencing parasite reproduction (Moraes &
Martins, 2004), was a strong component related
to monogenean, especially for 2008`s summer
and spring.
Water quality parameters were kept within
tolerance levels for fish maintenance (Sipaúba-
Tavares, 1998). According to Pereira &
Mercante (2005) ammonia may cause damage in
fish production system and its levels depends of
the amount fish, feeding rate, diet quality and
temperature. In summer 2008 and especially in
summer 2009 higher levels of ammonia were
observed due to enhanced fish metabolism and
increase of feeding related to higher water
temperatures. Despite the low levels of oxygen
in autumn 2009 and high ammonia
concentration in summer 2008 and 2009 no
abnormal fish behavior was observed. It could
be explained due to lower water temperature in
Southern Brazil when compared to Southeastern
region (Tavares-Dias et al., 2008).
Parasitological analysis showed highest
prevalence rates in spring and summer and the
lowest in winter, results that confirmed the
observations of Koskivaara et al. (1992) who
found greater abundance of Dactylogyrus
Diesing, 1850 in the gills of roach in spring and
summer. As demonstrated in this study and
compared to other Brazilian regions, water
temperature has a strong influence on the
parasite settlement (Buchmann & Bresciani,
1997). Garcia et al. (2003) related negative
correlation between temperature and
Urocleidoides sp. (Mizelle & Price, 1964)
Kritsky, Thatcher & Boeger, 1986 in sword tail
DISCUSSION
Spring 2008
Summer 2008
Summer 2009
Autumn 2009
Winter 2009
53
Neotrop. Helminthol., 8(1), 2014
Figure 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) of water quality parameters and Monogenean count data obtained from a fish pond
located in Chapecó, Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil. DO = dissolved oxygen; TR = transparency; WT = water temperature;
CT = electrical conductivity; AK = alkalinity; AM = ammonia; IR = iron; OP = orthophosphate; SF = sulphide; NI = nitrite; NA =
nitrate; MO = Monogenoidea.
54
Martins et al.
Microhabitat preference and seasonality of gill monogenean
and platy fish (Xiphophorus hellerii Heckel,
1848 and X. maculatus Gunther, 1866). It must
be added that not only the water temperature, but
also other factors like oxygen concentration
(Molnar, 1994) and handling management
(Jerônimo et al., 2011) are responsible for
modulating the parasite life cycle.
Seasonal occurrence of monogenean helminthes
was mostly studied in reservoirs (Rawson &
Rogers, 1973; Ranzani-Paiva et al., 2005) and
lakes (Ozturk & Altunel, 2006). The population
of Gyrodactylus macrochiri Hoffman et Putz,
1964 on largemouth bass (Micropterus
salmoides Lacepède, 1802) increased as the
o
water temperature reached 28 C (Rawson &
Rogers, 1973). Except for autumn 2009 our
results are in agreement with Koskivaara et al.
(1992). The authors also observed high mean
abundance of Dactylogyrus species in spring
and summer.
The present results are supported by these
authors where the highest mean intensity and
abundance were found in spring and summer.
Similarly to Ozturk & Altunel (2006) in autumn
2009 the majority of fish (97%) were infected
and in consequence the mean intensity and
abundance were statistically similar to spring
and summer.
The water temperature has an important
influence on the parasite abundance and egg
production in monogenean life cycle (Tinsley &
Jackson, 2002). The low infection observed in
summer 2009 might be related not only to the
water temperature (similar to autumn) but also
other environmental factors, like toxic
components as ammonia.
The seasonal variation of monogenean
infections in intensive fish farming is poorly
known, especially in Brazil. Flores-Crespo et al.
(1992) observed high infection by Dactylogyrus
sp. in reared tilapia. Later, Ranzani-Paiva et al.
(2005) confirmed high mean intensity of
monogenean in spring, peaking in summer.
Although the highest prevalence rates observed
in this study, the abundance of Cichlidogyrus
species was similar to that found by Lizama et al.
(2007). Kadlec et al. (2003) found Dactylogyrus
carpathicus Zachvatkin, 1951 as the most
abundant parasite in the gills of barbel (Barbus
barbus Linnaeus, 1758) in August. Contrarily,
Dactylogyrus malleus Linstow, 1877 showed
significant higher abundance in April. It's
necessary to remember that Kadlec et al. (2003)
obtained their results from the Danube River. In
a fish pond system, where stocking density and
feeding conditions are relatively stable, the
parasite abundance may not be affected, as here
demonstrated.
In terms of microhabitat, 68 to 73% of
Diclidophora merlangi Nordmann, 1832 found
on whiting (Gadus merlangus Linnaeus, 1758)
from the Irish Sea were in the first gill arch
(Arme & Halton, 1972). These authors
explained that in a single infection the majority
of worms could be located on the arch I, but in
multiple infections the parasites would be found
on the other arches. In part, this comment could
be applied to our research in which the
community of parasites was composed by
infrapopulations. Buchmann (1989) has
demonstrated preference of P. bini for arches I
and II and P. anguillae preference for arches III
and IV in European eel (Anguilla anguilla
Linnaeus, 1758). Although, in this study,
parasite species were not analyzed separately,
the results suggest that monogenean
infrapopulation in tilapia reared in ponds may
not vary among gill arches.
In the studies of Ramasamy et al. (1985)
parasites Scomberoides species from the Bay of
Bengal, India. Polyopisthocotyleans Vallisia
indica Unnithan, 1962 showed preference for
arch I, but, when low parasite intensities were
observed, they were also found on arches II and
III. In the present work, parasite intensity can be
considered lower than those normally observed
in cultured fish (Tavares-Dias et al., 2001),
supporting the hypothesis of Ramasamy et al.
(1985).
El Hafidi et al. (1998) reported the preference of
microhabitat in two species of Monogenea,
Metamicrocotyla cephalus Azim 1939 and
55
Neotrop. Helminthol., 8(1), 2014
Microcotyle mugilis Vogt, 1878 in the gills of
Mugil cephalus Linnaeus, 1758. They found that
when two species coexist, the intensity of
infection is higher than that in monospecific
infection. Both species showed preference for
gill arch I. It's normally reported that two species
coexisting may cause more damage on the host
than monospecific infections (Koskivaara et al.,
1992, Moraes & Martins, 2004). On the other
hand, the second arch was the most preferred
location by Pseudodactylogyrus in eel
(Matejusová et al., 2003). According to Kadlec
et al. (2003) the preference for microhabitat
within gills is modulated by the parasite
abundance. They found that the overlap between
species increased in cases of greatest
abundances. This could also be explaining the
lack of difference among the gill arches in the
present study.
The preference for the middle arches may be
related, among other factors, to greater surface
area (Ramasamy et al., 1985). According to
Geets et al. (1997) Pseudohaliotrema Yamaguti,
1952 was more abundant in the first two arches
of rabbit fish (Siganus sutor Valenciennes, 1835)
while Microcotyle mouwoi Ishii et Sawada, 1938
did not show preference for gill arch. Even
though, other factors are involved in the parasite
distribution on the gills such as health status,
parasite density and diversity. Another point that
must be emphasized is the distinct environment
where fish were captured.
The studies of Rubio-Godoy & Tinsley (2002)
showed that the parasites migrate from the site of
initial attachment to the most favorable place on
the gill arches. In contrast, this study did not
show any difference among the gill arches.
Possibly this could be related to low parasite
abundance when compared to those observed by
Rubio-Godoy (2008) and even to parasite
species.
This study suggests that parasitic fauna in
cultured tilapia may not vary considerably in
low water temperature. On the other hand, the
pond management such as feeding rate, water
flow, fish stocking density and the presence or
not of swine manure has a strong influence on
the parasitic life cycle. Further studies must be
carried out in other Brazilian fish farming
facilities to verify the parasite population in each
gill arch, which varies in morphology according
to fish species. Moreover, not only studies with
the Brazilian wild fishes must be encouraged to
improve the knowledge of the host parasite
environment system but also experimental trials
with different parasite density in controlled
conditions.
The authors thank CNPq (National Council for
Scientific and Technological Development for
financial support (CNPq/MAPA/SDA
577657/2008-9) and grant to the first author
(CNPq 301072/2008-7), and EMBRAPA
Macroprograma 1 AQUABRASIL.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
Arme, C & Halton, DW. 1972. Observations on
the occurrence of Diclidophora merlangi
(Trematoda: Monogenea) on the gills of
whiting, Gadus merlangus. Journal of Fish
Biology, vol. 4, pp. 27-32.
Bergh, O. 2007. The dual myths of the healthy
wild fish and the unhealthy farmed fish.
Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, vol. 75,
pp. 159-164.
Buchmann, K. 1989. Microhabitats of
monogenean gill parasites on European
e e l ( A ngu ill a an gui lla ) . F oli a
Parasitologica, vol. 36, pp. 321-329.
Buchmann, K & Bresciani, J. 1997. Parasitic
infections in pond-reared rainbow trout
Oncorhynchus mykiss in Denmark.
Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, vol. 28,
pp. 125-138.
Bush, AO, Lafferty, KD, Lotz, JM & Shostak, W.
1997. Parasitology meets ecology on its
own terms: Margolis et al. revisited.
Journal of Parasitology, vol. 83, pp. 575-
583.
Douëllou, L. 1993. Monogeneans of the genus
C i c h l i d o g y r u s P a p e r n a , 1 9 6 0
(Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae)
56
Martins et al.
Microhabitat preference and seasonality of gill monogenean
from cichlid fishes of Lake Kariba
(Zimbabwe) with descriptions of five new
species. Systematic Parasitology, vol. 25,
pp. 159-186.
D zi ka , E . 1 9 99 . M i c ro h a b i t a t s o f
Pseudodactylogyrus anguillae and P. bini
(Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) on the gills
of large-size European eel Anguilla
anguilla from Lake Gaj, Poland. Folia
Parasitologica, vol. 46, pp. 33-36.
E i r a s , J . C . 1 9 9 4 . E l e m e n t o s d e
ictioparasitologia. ed. Porto: Fundação
Eng. Antônio de Almeida, 339p.
El Hafidi, F, Berrada-Rkhami, O, Benazzou, T &
Gabrion, C. 1998. Microhabitat
di st ri bution and coexistence o f
Microcotylidae (Monogenea) on the gills
of the striped mullet Mugil cephalus:
chance or competition? Parasitology
Research, vol. 84, pp. 315-320.
Ergens, R. 1981. Nine species of the genus
C i c h l i d o g y r u s P a p e r n a , 1 9 6 0
(Monogenea: Ancyrocephalinae) from
Egyptian fishes. Folia Parasitologica, vol.
28, pp. 205-214.
Flores-Crespo, J. Velarde, FI. Flores-Crespo, R
& Vazquez-Pelaez, C.G. 1992. Variación
estacional de Dactylogyrus sp. em dos
unidades productoras de tilapia del
Estado de Morelos. Técnica Pecuaria en
México, vol. 30, pp. 109-118.
Garcia, F, Fujimoto, RY, Martins, ML & Moraes,
FR. 2003. Parasitismo de Xiphophorus
spp. por Urocleidoides sp. e sua relação
com os parâmetros hídricos. Boletim do
Instituto de Pesca, vol. 29, pp. 123-131.
Geets, A, Coene, H & Ollevier, F. 1997.
Ectoparasites of the whitespotted
rabbitfish, Siganus sutor (Valenciennes,
1835) off the Kenyan Coast: distribution
within the host and site selection on the
gills. Parasitology, vol. 115, pp. 69-79.
Hanek, G & Fernando, CH. 1978. Spatial
distribution of gill parasites of Lepomis
gibbosus (L.) and Ambloplites rupestris
(Raf.). Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol.
56, pp. 1235-1240.
Iannacone, J & Alvariño, L. 2012. Microecology
of the monogenean Mexicana sp. on the
gills of Anisotremus scapularis (Tschudi,
1846) (Osteichthyes, Haemulidae) of the
marine coast of Lima, Peru. Neotropical
Helminthology, vol. 6, pp. 277-285.
Jerônimo, GT, Speck, GM, Cechinel, MM,
Gonçalves, ELT & Martins, ML. 2011.
Seasonal variation on the ectoparasitic
communities of Nile tilapia cultured in
three regions in Southern Brazil. Brazilian
Journal of Biology, vol. 71, pp. 1-9.
Jerônimo, GT, Gonçalves, ELT, Bampi, D,
Paseto, A, Pádua, SB, Ishikawa, MM &
Martins, ML. 2013. Microhabitat of
monogenea and copepodids of Lernaea
cyprinacea on the gills of four Brazilian
f r e s h w a t e r f i s h . N e o t r o p i c a l
Helminthology, vol. 7, pp. 65-74.
Kadlec, D, Simková, A, & Gelnar, M. 2003. The
microhabitat distribution of two
Dactylogyrus species parasitizing the
gills of the barbell, Barbus barbus. Journal
of Helminthology, vol. 77, pp. 317-325.
Koskivaara, M, Valtonem, ET & Vuori, KM.
1992. Microhabitat distribution and
coexistence of Dactylogyrus species
(Monogenea) on the gills of roach.
Parasitology, vol. 104, pp. 273-281.
Kritsky, DC, Boeger, WA & Popazoglo, F. 1995.
Neotropical Monogenoidea. 22. Variation
in Scleroductus species (Gyrodactylidea,
Gyrodactylidae) from siluriform fishes of
so ut he astern Br az il . Journal of
Helminthology, vol. 62, pp. 53-65.
Lizama, M De Los AP, Takemoto, RM, Ranzani-
Paiva, MJT, Ayroza, LMS & Pavanelli,
GC. 2007. Relação parasito-hospedeiro
em peixes de pisciculturas da região de
Assis, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. 1.
Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1757).
Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences,
vol. 29, pp. 223-231.
Matejusová, I, Simková, A, Sasal, P & Gelnar,
M. 2003. Microhabitat distribution of
Pseudodactylogyrus anguillae and
Pseudodactylogyrus bini among and
within gill arches of the European eel
(Anguilla anguilla L.). Parasitology
Research, vol. 89, pp. 290-296.
Molnár, K. 1994. Effect of decreased water
oxygen content on common carp fry with
Dactylogyrus vastator (Monogenea)
Neotrop. Helminthol., 8(1), 2014
infection of varying severity. Diseases of
Aquatic Organisms, vol. 20, pp. 153-157.
Moraes, FR & Martins, ML. 2004. Condições
predisponentes e principais enfermidades
de teleósteos em piscicultura intensiva.
In: Cyrino, JEP, Urbinati, EC, Fracalossi,
DM & Castagnolli, N. Tópicos especiais
em piscicultura de água doce tropical
intensiva. São Paulo: TecArt, pp. 343-
383.
Oliva, ME & Luque, JL. 1998. Distribution
patterns of Microcotyle nemadactylus
(Monogenea) on gill filaments of
Cheilodactylus variegatus (Teleostei).
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol.
93, pp. 477-478.
Overstreet, RM. 1997. Parasitological data as
monitors of environmental health.
Parassitologia, vol. 39, pp. 169-175.
Öztürk, MO & Altunel, FN. 2006. Occurrence
of Dactylogyrus infection linked to
seasonal changes and host fish size on
four cyprinid fishes in Lake Manyas,
Turkey. Acta Zoologica Academiae
Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 52,
pp.407-415.
Paperna, I. & Thurston, J.P. 1969. Monogenetic
trematodes collected from cichlid fish in
Uganda; including the description of five
new species of Cichlidogyrus. Revue de
Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines, vol.
79, pp. 1-2.
Pariselle, A & Euzet, L. 1995. Gill parasites of
the genus Cichlidogyrus Paperna, 1960
(Monogenea, Ancyrocephalidae) from
Tilapia guineensis (Bleeker, 1862), with
descriptions of six new species.
Systematic Parasitology, vol. 30, pp. 187-
198.
Pariselle, A, Bilong, C & Euzet, L. 2003. Four
new species of Cichlidogyrus Paperna,
1960 (Monogenea, Ancyrocephalidae),
al l g il l parasites from Af ri ca n
mouthbreeder tilapias of the genera
Sarotherodon and Oreochromis (Pisces,
Cichlidae), with a redescription of C.
thurstonae Ergens, 1981. Systematic
Parasitology, vol. 56, pp. 201-210.
Pereira, LPF & Mercante, CTJ. 2005. Ammonia
in fish breeding systems and its effects on
the water quality-a review. Boletim do
Instituto de Pesca, vol. 31, pp. 81-88.
Ramasamy, P, Ramalingam, K, Hanna, EB &
Halton, DW. 1985. Microhabitats of gill
parasites (Monogenea and Copepoda) of
tel eos ts ( Scomberomorus s pp. ).
International Journal for Parasitology,
vol. 15, pp. 385-397.
Ranzani-Paiva, MJT, Felizardo, NN & Luque,
JL. 200 5 . P a r a s i t o l o g i cal a n d
hematological analysis of Nile tilapia
Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1757
from Guarapiranga reservoir, São Paulo
State, Brazil. Acta Scientiarum Biological
Sciences, vol. 27, pp. 231-237.
Rawson, MV & Rogers, WA. 1973. Seasonal
abundance of Gyrodactylus macrochiri
Hoffman and Putz, 1964 on bluegill and
largemouth bass. Journal of Wildlife
Diseases, vol. 9, pp. 174-177.
Rubio-Godoy, M. 2008. Microhabitat selection
of Discocotyle sagittata (Monogenea:
Polyopisthocotylea) in farmed rainbow
trout. Folia Parasitologica, vol. 55, pp.
270-276.
Rubio-Godoy, M. & Tinsley, R.C. 2002. Trickle
and single infection with Discocotyle
s a g i t t a t a ( M o n o g e n e a :
Polyopisthocotylea): effect of exposure
mode on parasite abundance and
development. Folia Parasitologica, vol.
49, pp. 269-278.
Sipaúba-Tavares, LH. 1998. Limnologia dos
sistemas de cultivo. In: Carcinicultura de
água doce. São Paulo. FUNEP, pp. 47-75.
Tavares-Dias, M, Moraes, FR & Martins, ML.
2008. Hematological assessment in four
Brazilian teleost fish with parasitic
infections, collected in feefishing from
Franca, São Paulo, Brazil. Boletim do
Instituto de Pesca, vol. 34, pp. 189-196.
Tavares-Dias, M, Moraes, FR, Martins, ML &
Kronka, SN. 2001. Fauna parasitária de
peixes oriundos de “pesque-pague” do
município de Franca, São Paulo, Brasil.
II. Metazoários. Revista Brasileira de
Zoologia, vol. 18, pp. 81-95.
Tinsley, RC & Jackson, JA. 2002. Host factors
limiting monogenean infections: a case
study. International Journal for
57
Martins et al.
Microhabitat preference and seasonality of gill monogenean
Received December 17, 2013.
Accepted January 19, 2014.
Parasitology, vol. 32, pp. 353-365.
Xu, DH, Shoemaker, CA & Klesius, PH. 2007.
Evaluation of the link between
gyrodactylosis and streptococcosis of Nile
tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.).
Journal of Fish Diseases, v. 30, p. 233-
238.
58