ORIGINAL ARTICLE /ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL
HELMINTH COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF ARAPAIMA GIGAS IN SEMI-INTENSIVE
AND INTENSIVE FISH FARMING SYSTEMS IN THE SOUTHWESTERN BRAZILIAN
AMAZON
ESTRUCTURA DE LA COMUNIDAD DE HELMINTOS DE ARAPAIMA GIGAS EN
SISTEMAS SEMI-INTENSIVOS E INTENSIVOS DE CULTIVO EN EL SUROESTE DE
LA AMAZONIA BRASILEÑA
1,5 1 2,5
Maralina Torres da Silva ; Geazi Penha Pinto ; Pedro Hercílio de Oliveira Cavalcante ; Francisco Glauco de
3 4 4
Araújo Santos ; Vanessa Arruda das Chagas Moutinho & Cláudia Portes Santos
1Instituto Federal do Acre – IFAC, Rio Branco, AC, Brazil.
Instituto Federal do Acre – IFAC, Xapuri, AC, Brazil.
2
Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Natureza, Universidade Federal do Acre – UFAC, Rio Branco, AC, Brazil.
3
Laboratório de Avaliação e Promoção da Saúde Ambiental, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
4
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Saúde, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz.
5
Corresponding author: Maralina Torres da Silva (Silva, MT),Instituto Federal do Acre – IFAC. Rua Rio Grande do Sul 2600,
Bairro Aeroporto Velho, Rio Branco, AC, Brazil, 69.911-030. Tel: +55 (68) 999844402. E-mail: maralina.silva@ifac.edu.br;
maralinatorres@gmail.com
Neotropical Helminthology, 2016, 10(2), jul-dic: 219-231.
ABSTRACT
Keywords: Acanthocephala – aquaculture – Arapaima gigas – Brazil – Monogenea – Nematoda
In the Amazon, investments in new technology for fish farming have been made in recent years.
Arapaima gigas is considered one of the species with greatest potential for fish farming in the
region. The systems to farm this species in the Amazon are highly diversified, ranging from semi-
intensive to intensive or industrial. The objective of this study was to analyze the helminth
community structure of A. gigas comparing two farming systems. A total of 121 fish were
obtained from a semi-intensive and an intensive systems in the state of Acre, Brazil. A total of
nine species of parasites were identified, with only one species in common. There was a
2
significant difference with respect to parasite prevalence levels between the two fish farms =
44.99 p < 0.05), and the fish from the semi-intensive system showed significantly higher levels of
infection (90.63%) than those from the intensive system (31.57%). In the semi-intensive system,
nine parasite species were collected and identified: Dawestrema cycloancistrium;
Capillostrongyloides arapaimae; Goezia spinulosa; Hysterothylacium sp.; Camallanidae gen.
sp.; Ascaridoidea gen. sp.; Polyacanthorhynchus sp. (juvenile), Neoechinorhynchus sp. and
Acanthocephala gen. sp. In the intensive fish farm, only D. cycloancistrium was found,
representing 100% of the specimens collected. The comparative analysis regarding the
prevalence of D. cycloancistrium between the two fish farms showed a significant difference,
2
with higher prevalence in the semi-intensive system = 7.426 p = 0.006). This is the first study
of the helminth community of A. gigas in Acre and provides new information for fish farmers to
enhance their production.
219
ISSN Versión impresa 2218-6425 ISSN Versión Electrónica 1995-1043
220
RESUMEN
Palabras clave: Acanthocephala – acuicultura – Arapaima gigas – Brasil – Monogenea – Nematoda
En la Amazonia, las inversiones en nuevas tecnologías para el cultivo de peces se han hecho en
los últimos años. Arapaima gigas es considerada una de las especies con mayor potencial para la
piscicultura en la región. Los sistemas que cultivan esta especie en el Amazonas son muy
diversos, que van desde semi-intensivo para intensivo o industrial. El objetivo de este estudio fue
analizar la estructura de la comunidad de helmintos de A. gigas comparando dos sistemas de
cultivo. Un total de 121 peces se obtuvieron de un sistema semi-intensivo y otro intensivo en el
estado de Acre, Brasil. Se identificaron un total de nueve especies de parásitos, con una sola
especie en común. Hubo una diferencia significativa con respecto a los niveles de prevalencia de
2
parásitos entre los dos cultivos de peces (χ= 44,99 p <0,05), y el pescado desde el sistema de
cultivo semi-intensivo mostraron niveles significativamente más altos de infección (90,63%)
que los del cultivo intensivo (31,57%). En el sistema semi-intensivo, se recolectaron e
identificaron nueve especies de parásitos: Dawestrema cycloancistrium; Capillostrongyloides
arapaimae; Goezia spinulosa; Hysterothylacium sp.; Camallanidae gen. sp.; Ascaridoidea gen.
sp.; Polyacanthorhynchus sp. (Juvenil), Neoechinorhynchus sp. y Acanthocephala gen. sp. En el
cultivo intensivo, sólo se encontró D. cycloancistrium, que representa el 100% de las muestras
recogidas. El análisis comparativo con respecto a la prevalencia de D. cycloancistrium entre los
dos cultivos de pescado mostró una diferencia significativa, con mayor prevalencia en el sistema
2
semi-intensivo (χ = 7,42 p = 0,006). Este es el primer estudio de la comunidad de parásitos de A.
gigas en Acre y proporciona nueva información para los acuicultores para aumentar su
producción.
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016
INTRODUCTION
T h e A m a z o n r e g i o n h a s f a v o r a b le
environmental conditions for the development
of fish farming, due to the high diversity of fish
species, availability of water resources, stable
temperatures throughout the year, large areas
and strategic geographic position, enabling
connection with Asian and American markets
(Brown et al., 2002).
In recent years, the Amazon region has
received high investments to develop fish
farming. Several studies have been conducted
of fish species that have high market value and
favorable traits for farming, such as high
reproductive potential and high development
and juvenile survival rates (Oliveira et al.,
2012). Arapaima gigas (Schinz, 1822)
(Arapaimidae), known as arapaima or
pirarucu, is considered the species with the
greatest potential for fish farming in the region
(Roubach et al., 2003; Lima et al., 2015).
The arapaima farming systems in the Amazon
are highly diversified, ranging from semi-
intensive to intensive or industrial. Semi-
intensive breeding is usually performed by
family farmers, with little use of feeding,
moderate stocking densities and regular
renewal of water. The intensive system is
structured to provide a balanced diet, control
physical and chemical parameters of water and
assure constant water renewal with high
densities of fish, through the use of
technologies for increased productivity (Tacon
& Silva, 1997; Naylor et al., 2000).
Silva et al.
221
which fingerlings were grown after spawning.
In this environment, the supply of feed of crude
protein 40% was given twice a day. The stock
3
density was 0.15 fish/m .
In the intensive system, the breeding fish were
placed in earthen ponds where the water
supplied from local streams was renewed daily
and filtered in a system with 400 microns
mesh. The water temperature and oxygen were
controlled daily. The fry were collected
immediately after spawning and transported to
the laboratory where they were first kept in
aluminum vats, then transferred to circular
concrete tanks where they lived until reaching
about 15 cm, when they were taken to network
tanks and then released into the growth ponds.
High quality balanced feed with 45% crude
protein was provided 6 to 8 times a day and
preventive control of parasites was carried out
with anthelmintics. During all phases, fry were
collected at random for analysis of possible
parasites in the farm's laboratory. The stock
3
density varied from 0.75 to 10 fish/m
depending on the size of the spawning from the
breeding pair.
Collection of parasites
A total of 121 fish were captured from October
2013 to June 2015 (Fig. 2), 64 from the semi-
intensive system and 57 from the intensive fish
farm. The specimens were weighed (W),
measured for total length (TL) and examined in
saline medium and under a stereomicroscope.
The parasites were fixed in 70% ethanol and a
sample of each species was fixed in 4%
formalin for scanning electron microscopic
procedures (SEM). The formalinfixed
specimens were washed in 0.1 M cacodylate
buffer pH 7.2, post-fixed in 1% OsO and 0.8%
4
potassium ferrocyanide for 1 h, dehydrated in a
graded series of ethanol solutions (30–100%)
for 1 h for each step, critical-point dried in CO ,
2
sputter coated with gold and examined using a
Jeol JSM 6390 microscope.
Fish confinement, independent of the
production system, favors the risk of parasitic
infections (Malta & Varella, 2000; Araújo et
al., 2009; Santos & Moravec, 2009; Gaines et
al., 2012), which is one of the major limiting
factors for the development, growth and
maintenance of fish populations, causing
considerable economic losses (Malta et al.,
2001).
Although A. gigas is a keystone species for
science and has high economic value, there are
few studies about the community structure of
parasites, and they generally do not focus on
the infra-communities. The objective of this
work was to analyze the helminth community
structure of A. gigas comparing two types of
fish farming systems in the southwestern
Amazon region, semi- intensive and intensive.
Ethics statement
This study was authorized by the Brazilian
Institute of Environment and Renewable
Natural Resources (IBAMA, license no.
39106/2013) in accordance with the guidelines
of the Brazilian College for Animal
Experimentation (COBEA).
Study areas
The fish were obtained from two fish farms,
one using a semi-intensive system in the
municipality of Bujari, (9°45'24.5"S
68°04'25.0"W) and the other an intensive
syste m i n S enador G ui omar Sant os
(10°05'00.7"S 67°32'06.8"W), both in Acre
state, southwestern Amazon, Brazil (Fig. 1).
At the semi-intensive fish farm, the breeding
stock fish were kept in earthen ponds receiving
water in natura from a local stream. The level
of the water from the ponds was completed
monthly and supplied polyethylene tanks in
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Helminth community structure of Arapaima gigas
222
Ludwig & Reynolds (1988) for each
infracommunity.
Fish samples
A total of 121 specimens of A. gigas from the
two fish farms were examined (Table 1). The
64 arapaimas from the semi-intensive farm
(Fig. 3) measured 7-42 cm (TL), weighed 2-
392 g (W) and harbored 14,822 individual
parasites of nine species. The 57 arapaimas
from the intensive fish farm (Fig. 4) measured
15.5-50 cm (TL) with 27-496 g (W) and
contained 6,319 parasites of just one species
(Table 1).
Component community
A total of nine species of parasites were
identified in the fish from both farms, with just
one species in common. There was a
significant difference with respect to parasite
2
prevalence levels between the farms =
44.99, p < 0.05), and the specimens from the
semi-intensive system showed significantly
higher levels of infection (90.63%) than those
from the intensive system (31.57%).
In the semi-intensive farm, a total of nine
parasite species were collected, identified as
Goezia spinulosa (Diesing, 1839) (Figs 5-6);
the monogenean Dawestrema cycloancistrium
Price and Nowlin, 1967 (Fig. 7); the
nematodes Capillostrongyloides arapaimae
Santos et al., 2008c; Hysterothylacium sp.
(Larva L3) (Figs 8-9); Camallanidae gen. sp.
and Ascaridoidea gen. sp. (Larva); the
acanthocephalans Polyacanthorhynchus sp.
( j u v e n i l e ) ( F i g . 1 0 ) , a s w e l l a s
Neoechinorhynchus sp. and Acanthocephala
gen. sp. (Table 2). Monogenean parasites
represented the majority of the collected
specimens (95.64%), followed by Nematoda
(4.04%) and Acanthocephala (0.32%). The
Monogenea D. cycloancistrium was the
predominant species, with 14,176 specimens
The Nematoda were cleared and examined on
temporary slides mounted with glycerin while
Monogenea were cleared in Berlese or Hoyer
medium or were stained with Gomori's
trichrome and examined as permanent mounts
in Canada balsam. The Acanthocephala were
cleared in glycerin or s tained with
paracarmine. Drawings were made with the aid
of a drawing tube. Parasites were identified
according to Kritsky et al. (1985), Costa et al.
(1995), Moravec (1998), Santos et al. (2008 b,
c), Santos & Moravec (2009), Thatcher (2006),
Luque et al. (2011) and Cohen et al. (2013).
Ecological data
The ecological terms used for parasite
populations and communities followed Bush
et al. (1997). The prevalences from different
fish farming systems were evaluated for
common species using the chi-squared test
using the Quantitative Parasitology 3.0
program (Rózsa et al., 2000).
The helminth community was studied at
infrapopulation and infracommunity levels
(i.e., all parasites of a given species in an
individual fish and all infrapopulations in an
individual fish, respectively) using the data on
the fish collected from each farm, representing
a component community. The total abundance,
Brillouin's diversity index, Pielou's evenness
index, Margalef's richness index and the
Berger-Parker dominance index of the
infracommunities were also calculated using
Past version 2.17c (Hammer et al., 2001).
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r)
s
was calculated to determine possible
correlations between the total length of hosts
and parasite abundance.
The variance-mean ratio of parasite abundance
(dispersion index) and Poulin discrepancy
index (D) were employed to detect distribution
patterns of the parasite infracommunity (Rózsa
et al., 2000) in species with prevalence ≥10%.
Index of dispersion (ID) significance was
tested using the d-statistic according to
RESULTS
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Silva et al.
Parasites
Prevalence
(%)
Mean
Abundance ± s
Mean
Intensity ± s
Total number
of parasites
Infection / Infestation
site
Semi-intensive fish farm
Monogenea
Dawestrema cycloancistrium
56.25
221.50 ± 293.03
393.78 ± 353.35
14,176
Gills
Nematoda
Ascaridoidea gen. sp.
(Larva)
3.13
0.13 ± 0.24
4.00 ± 1.00
08
Intestine
Camallanidae gen. sp.
1.56
0.02 ± 0.03
1.00 ± 0.00
01
Intestine
Capillostrongyloides
arapaimae
20.31
2.03 ± 3.31
10.00 ± 11.08
130
Stomach, intestine
and intestinal cecum
Goezia spinulosa
29.69
1.19 ± 1.73
4.00 ± 3.58
76
Stomach, intestine
and intestinal cecum
Hysterothylacium
sp.
(Larva)
53.13
5.98 ± 7.76
11.26 ± 10.57
383
Stomach and intestine
Acanthocephala
Polyacanthorhynchus
sp.
21.88
0.72
± 1.12
3.29
± 2.08
46
Intestine
Neoechinorhynchus
sp.
1.56
0.02 ± 0.03
1.00 ±
0.00
01
Intestine
Acanthocephala gen. sp.
1.56
0.02 ± 0.03
1.00 ±
0.00
01
Intestine
Intensive fish farm
Monogenea
Dawestrema cycloancistrium
31.57
110.86 ± 248.28
351.05 ± 248.27
6,319
Gills
s = standard deviation
223
Infracommunities
From the 64 specimens of A. gigas examined
from the semi-intensive fish farm, 58 (90.63%)
were parasitized by at least one species. A total
of 14,822 individual parasites were collected,
with mean of 255.55 parasites/fish. Six fish
hosts were not parasitized (9.38%); 22 fish
were infected by only one parasite species
(34.38%); 17 hosts harbored two parasite
species (26.56%); and 14 fish contained three
parasite species (21.88%). The remaining fish
collected, and showed the highest values of
mean abundance and mean intensity. At the
intensive fish farm, only one species, the
monogenean D. cycloancistrium, was found,
representing 100% of the specimens collected.
The comparative analysis regarding the
prevalence of D. cycloancistrium between the
two farms showed a significant difference,
with higher prevalence in the semi-intensive
2
system = 7.42, p = 0.006).
Table 1 Parasitological data of Arapaima gigas from two fish farms in Acre, Brazil
Semi-intensive fish farm Intensive fish farm Total
N. examined fish 64 57 121
N. parasitized fish 58 18 76
Prevalence (%) 90.63 31.57 62.80
Total number of parasites 14,822 6,319 21,141
Table 2 Quantitative descriptors, infection/infestation site and community status of parasites of Arapaima gigas
from the two fish farms, Acre, Brazil
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Helminth community structure of Arapaima gigas
224
between total length of fish and parasite
abundance (Spearman rank correlation
coefficient, r= 0.54, p < 0.01).
s
At the intensive fish farm, 18 fish (31.57%)
were parasitized by a single species. The
remaining hosts (68.43%) were free of
parasites. The Spearman rank correlation
coefficients between host length and parasite
abundance were significant (r= 0.36, p =
s
0.005).
were parasitized by four, five and six parasite
species. The parasites showed a typical pattern
of aggregated distribution (Table 3). At the
semi-intensive fish farm, the mean parasite
richness index was d = 2.18 and the mean
Pielou evenness index was J = 0.54. The
parasite infracommunities presented mean
diversity of HB = 1.287 ± 1.03 and maximum
diversity of 2.87. The Berger-Parker
dominance index presented a mean of 0.55 ±
0.31. Significant correlation was observed
Figures 1-4. 1. Study areas: Bujari (9°45'24.5"S 68°04'25.0"W) and Senador Guiomard Santos (10°05'00.7"S 67°32'06.8"W),
Acre state, southwest Amazon, Brazil. Star = Semi-intensive fish farm, Circle = Intensive fish farm. 2. Specimen of Arapaima
gigas collected from fish farm. 3. Polyethylene tanks at the semi-intensive fish farm where fingerlings are grown. 4. Laboratory
with aluminum vats and circular concrete tanks where fingerlings are grown in the intensive fish farm.
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Silva et al.
225
Figures 5-10. 5. Goezia spinulosa: anterior end of body, lateral view. 6. Goezia spinulosa: cephalic end, apical view. 7.
Dawestrema cycloancistrium: total. 8. Hysterothylacium sp. (L3): total. 9. Hysterothylacium sp. (L3): anterior end provided with
ventral cephalic tooth, lateral view. 10. Polyacanthorhynchus sp. (juvenile): total.
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Helminth community structure of Arapaima gigas
226
Parasites DI d D
Dawestrema cycloancistrium 856.09 4876.83 0.768
Capillostrongyloides arapaimae 46.67 98.10 0.921
Goezia spinulosa 9.97 27.43 0.857
Hysterothylacium sp. (Larva) 23.44 121.76 0.777
Polyacanthorhynchus sp. 4 39 8.76 0.853
*DI and D were employed in species with prevalence ≥10%.
Table 3. The Dispersion Index (DI), statistical test (d) and discrepancy index (D) of the parasites of Arapaima gigas
from the Semi-intensive fish farm, Acre, Brazil*
DISCUSSION
One of the barriers to the production of the
arapaimas in fish farms is parasitic diseases,
which influence the quantity and quality of fish
produced (Gaines et al., 2012). Study of the
parasitic fish community structure provides a
range of information on habits and habitat of
the host and contributes to the understanding
of the distribution, prevalence and specificity
of parasites (Dias et al., 2004). The literature
reports 21 metazoan parasite species of A.
gigas (Baylis, 1927; Thatcher, 2006). We
identified nine species.
The high prevalence of fish parasites in the
semi-intensive farm (90.63%) was similar to
that reported by Marinho et al. (2013) for the
same host species in fish farms in Amapá state
(northeastern Amazon region) and by Araújo et
al. (2009) in semi-intensive culture in
Amazonas state (central Amazon). This pattern
of infection, according to these authors, can be
associated with the inadequate tank
management. In the present study, this factor
also explain the high prevalence of parasites in
the semi-intensive farm, since the water used
in nurseries, ponds and tanks does not pass
through a filter system and can carry
pathogenic organisms to the fish (Tavares-
Dias, 2011). Allied to this, the monthly water
level renewal with no filters, failure to control
oxygen and temperature parameters and lack
of disinfection of structures and devices can
facilitate the entrance and spread of parasites in
the system (Lima et al., 2015). In contrast, in
the intensive fish farming system, where the
water is renewed daily, filtered with a 400
mesh net, temperature and oxygen are
controlled daily and anthelmintics are used, the
parasitic infection was significantly lower,
restricted to external monogenean parasites.
According to Lima et al. (2015), a factor that
must be taken into consideration is the fact that
the fingerlings are usually caught from the
ponds more than 10 days after hatching, so an
initial load of parasites is already present in
these fish due to the contact with the
environment and even with parents. In the
intensive fish farming system, the fry are taken
from nurseries soon after spawning, thus
reducing the rates of parasitic infections.
Dawestrema cycloancistrium is a monogenean
specific to arapaimas and was the only species
found in both fish farms studied, with
significantly higher abundance (14,176 ×
6,319 specimens) and prevalence (56.25% ×
31.57%) in the semi-intensive production
system. This species has also been reported
from the gills of farmed arapaimas in the states
of Amazonas (Araujo et al., 2009), Amapá
(Marinho et al., 2013) and Mato Grosso
(Santos et al., 2008a) in Brazil and in the state
of Loreto in Peru (Mathews et al., 2013;
Serrano-Martínez et al., 2015). It is highly
pathogenic and can cause serious injury to the
gills and cause death. High infestations of
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Silva et al.
227
with the water coming directly from nearby
streams.
The prevalences of C. arapaimae (20.31%)
and the juveniles of Polyacanthorhynchus sp.
(21.88%) were considered important, since C.
a r a p a i m a e a n d t w o s p e c i e s o f
Polyacanthorhynchus have previously been
reported in arapaimas and have the ability to
penetrate the intestine wall for attachment,
w h er e t h e y c a u s e t i s s u e d a m a g e s.
Hysterothylacium sp. had a high prevalence
(53.13%), but they were encysted L3 larvae
with boring tooth, using the arapaimas as
intermediate or paratenic hosts, and no visible
damages were observed.
Neoechinorhynchus sp., Acanthocephala gen.
sp. and Camallanidae gen. sp. were
represented by a single individual each and
Ascaridoidea gen. sp. by eight larvae, not
representing important infrapopulations that
could cause damage to the cultured fish.
The aggregate distribution pattern of the
parasites of A. gigas is in accordance with that
reported by Marinho et al. (2013) for the same
species, in fish farms in Amapá state. Poulin
(2007) called this common pattern of
distribution the 'The First General Law of
Parasite Ecology' and Gourbière et al. (2015)
complemented that the aggregated distribution
has significant implications both for hosts and
parasites, because it can cause major
consequences in production systems, also
impacting public health. In this study, all the
parasites had an aggregated distribution
pattern. However, the Monogenea presented
particularly high values, indicating that in
farming systems where the density of hosts is
high, these parasites with direct life cycle have
greater dispersion capacity.
The ecological descriptors of diversity,
evenness and dominance of the parasites of A.
gigas were calculated only for the semi-
intensive system, given that in the intensive
species of Dawestrema were observed by
Mathews et al. (2014) in a semi-intensive fish
farming system in Peru. The authors related the
high level of parasitism in A. gigas with an
imbalance in the homeostasis of fish, caused
by changes in the concentration of ammonia in
t h e w a t e r. T h e o c c u r r e n c e o f D.
cycloancistrium in both farming systems and
their occurrence in different geographical
areas can be explained by their direct life cycle
a nd s m a l l s i z e a n d h e rm a p h ro d i t e
reproduction, thus favoring their occurrence
and transmission among different tanks, as
occurs in general with monogenean species
(Luque, 2004; Pavanelli et al., 2008).
Nematodes also cause serious infections in
farmed fish, and G. spinulosa, which occurred
with prevalence of 29.69%, is a highly
pathogenic parasite of arapaimas during the
fingerling and juvenile stages, negatively
influencing fish health (Freitas & Lent, 1946;
Moravec et al., 1994; Santos & Moravec,
2009). Cultured fingerlings are especially
sensitive to this parasitosis, which contributes
substantially to the high mortality of arapaima
fingerlings in fish farms (Santos & Moravec,
2009). They become infected by consuming
zooplankton (copepods) containing the L3
larvae, which are released into the digestive
tract. Ensembles of multiple adults are then
found attached to the stomach wall, producing
ulcers. Santos & Moravec (2009) observed that
fingerlings ranging in length from 6.5-15 cm
only harbored larval G. spinulosa encysted on
the surface of the stomach and pyloric caeca, in
the mesentery, while sub-adults were found in
the lumen of the stomach. The fish specimens
examined here in both systems, ranging from
7-50 cm, harbored sub-adults and adults with
eggs, without causing perforations, although
some small ulcers were seen. It is possible that
the water supply of the ponds and tanks in the
semi-intensive system favored the G.
spinulosa life cycle, given that lack of special
barriers as filters in nurseries can allow
infected plankton to enter these environments
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Helminth community structure of Arapaima gigas
228
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal
de Ensino Superior (CAPES-Parasitologia
Básica), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz/
IOC/ PAEF), Instituto Federal do Acre (IFAC)
and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Acre
(FAPAC). M.T. Silva, V.A.C. Moutinho and
C.P. Santos were sponsored by CNPq
fellowships.
The funders had no role in study design, data
collection and analysis, decision to publish, or
preparation of the manuscript.
system just one type of parasite was found.
According to Magurran (2004), these indices
are very useful, but only when employed for
comparisons, because the values alone are not
informative. This is the first work that cites
values of diversity, evenness and dominance
indices of the parasites of A. gigas, and can
serve as a basis of comparison for future
studies.
In both cultivation systems, parasite
abundance significantly increased with the
host size. Poulin (2000) considers that this is a
common feature in the host-parasite
relationship, since larger fish have more varied
diet, greater contact surface for parasites and
higher number of niches, among other factors
(Morand & Poulin, 1998; Timi & Poulin,
2003).
Finally, this study shows that good production
conditions, including immediate collection of
fingerlings after spawning, water filtering
before entry into nurseries and use of
disinfecting materials during breeding can
drastically reduce infection by parasites. This
is the first study of the parasite community of
A. gigas in Acre state and provides new
information for fish farmers to enhance their
production.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no
competing interests.
Authors' contributions
All authors contributed equally to the study.
All authors read and approved the final
manuscript.
The study was financially supported by
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento
Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq- Universal),
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Araújo, CSO, Gomes, AL, Tavares-Dias, M,
Andrade, SMS, Belem-Costa, A,
Borges, JT, Queiroz, MN & Barbosa, M.
2009. Parasitic infections in pirarucu
fry, Arapaima gigas Schinz, 1822
(Arapaimatidae) kept in a semi-intensive
fish farm in Central Amazon, Brazil.
Veterinarski arhiv, vol. 79, pp. 499-507.
Baylis, HA. 1927. Some parasitic worms from
Arapaima gigas (Teleostean fish) with a
description of Nilonema senticosa n. sp.
(Filarioidea). Parasitology, vol. 19, pp.
35-47.
Brown, IF, Brilhante, SH, Mendoza, E & de
Oliveira, IR. 2002. Estrada de Rio
Branco, Acre, Brasil aos Portos do
Pacífico: Como maximizar os benefícios
e minimizar os prejuízos para o
de sen vol vim ent o su ste ntá vel da
Amazônia Sul-Ocidental. In: Tizón, AW
& Duarte, RSG. Intergración regional
entre Bolívia, Brasil y Perú. Cepei,
Lima, pp. 281-296.
Bush, AO, Lafferty, KD, Lotz, JM & Shostak,
AW. 1997. Parasitology meets ecology
on its own terms: Margolis et al.
Revisited. The Journal of Parasitology, v.
83, pp. 575-583.
Cohen, SC, Justo, MC & Kohn, A. 2013. South
American Monogenoidea Parasites of
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Silva et al.
229
with descriptions of two new species and
r e d e s c r i p t i o n o f D a w e s t r e m a
cycloancistrium Price and Nowlin, 1967
(Dactylogyridae: Ancyrocephalinae).
Proceedings of the Biological Society of
Washington, vol. 98, pp. 321-331.
Lima, AF, Rodrigues, APO, Varela, ES, Torati,
LS & Maciel, PO. 2015. Pirarucu
culture in the Brazilian Amazon:
fledgling industry faces technological
issues. Global Aquaculture Advocate,
vol. 18, pp. 56-58.
Ludwig, JA & Reynolds, JF. 1988. Statistical
ecology. John Wiley, New York.
Luque, JL. 2004. Biologia, epidemiologia e
controle de parasitos de peixes. Revista
Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária,
vol. 13, pp. 161-165.
Luque, JL, Aguiar, JC, Vieira, FM, Gibson, DI
& Santos, CP. 2011. Checklist of
Nematoda associated with the fishes of
Brazil. Zootaxa, vol. 3082, pp. 1-88.
Magurran, AE. 2004. Measuring biological
diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Malta, JCO & Varella, AMB. 2000. Argulus
chicomendesi sp. n. (Crustacea:
Argulidae) parasita de peixes da
Amazônia Brasileira. Acta Amazonica,
vol. 30, pp. 481-498.
Malta, JCO, Gomes, ALS, Andrade, SMS &
Varella, AMB. 2001. Infestações
m a c i ç a s p o r a c a n t o c é f a l o s ,
Neoechinorhynchus buttnerae Golvan,
1 9 5 6 , ( E o a c a n t h o c e p h a l a :
Neoechinorhynchidae) em tambaquis
jovens, Colossoma macropomum
(Cuvier, 1818) cultivados na Amazônia
Central. Acta Amazonica, vol. 31, pp.
133-143.
Marinho, RGB, Tavares-Dias, M, Dias-
Grigório, MKR, Neves, LR, Yoshioka,
ETO, Boijink, CL & Takemoto, RM.
2013. Helminthes and protozoan of
farmed pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) in
eastern Amazon and host-parasite
relationship. Arquivo Brasileiro de
Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, vol.
Fishes, Amphibians and Reptiles.
Oficina de livros, Rio de Janeiro.
Costa, HMA, Guimarães, MP, Cabral, DD &
Mundim, JS. 1995. Scanning eléctron
microscopic observations on Goezia
spinulosa (Diesing, 1839) (Nematoda:
Anisakidae) from Arapaima gigas
(Cuvier, 1817). Memórias do Instituto
Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 90, pp. 703-705.
Dias, PG, Furuya, WM, Pavanelli, GC,
Machado, MH & Takemoto, RM. 2004.
Carga parasitária de Rondonia rondoni,
Travassos, 1920 (Nematoda, Atrictidae)
e fator de condição do armado,
Pterodoras granulosus, Valenciennes,
1833 (Pisces, Doradidae). Acta
Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, vol.
26, pp. 151-156.
Freitas, JT & Lent, H. 1946. Infestação de
apaiarís Astronotus ocellatus
(Agassiz) pelo nematódeo Goezia
spinulosa (Diesing, 1839). Revista
Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 6, pp.
215–222.
Gaines, APL, Lozano, LES, Viana, GM,
Monteiro, PC & Araújo, CSO. 2012.
Tissue changes in the gut of Arapaima
gigas (Schinz, 1822), infected by the
nematode Spirocamallanus inopinatus
(Travassos, 1 9 2 9 ) . Neotropical
Helminthology, vol. 6, pp. 147-157.
Gourbière, S, Morand, S & Waxman, D. 2015.
Fundamental factors determining the
nature of parasite aggregation in hosts.
th
PLoS ONE, 10, accessed in July 5 ,
2 0 1 6 ,
<http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article
/asset?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.011
6893.PDF>
Hammer, Ø, Harper, DAT & Ryan, PD. 2001.
PAST: Paleontological Statistics
Software package for education and
d a t a a n a l y s i s . P ala e o n t ol o g i a
Electronica, vol. 4, 1-9.
Kritsky, DC, Boeger, WA & Thatcher. 1985.
Neotropical Monogenea. 7. Parasites of
the pirarucu Arapaima gigas (Cuvier),
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Helminth community structure of Arapaima gigas
230
parasite ecology? Parasitology, vol. 134,
pp. 763–776.
Poulin, R. 2000. Variation in the intraspecific
relationship between fish length and
inten sity of p arasiti c i nfectio n:
biological and statistical causes. Journal
of Fish Biology, vol. 56, pp. 123–137.
Roubach, R, Correia, ES, Zaiden, S, Martino,
R.C & Cavalli, RO. 2003. Aquaculture
in Brazil. World Aquaculture, vol. 34,
pp. 28–35.
Rózsa, L, Reiczigel, J & Majoros, G. 2000.
Quantifying parasites in samples of
hosts. The Journal of Parasitology, vol.
86, pp. 228–232.
Santos, SMC, Ceccarelli, OS & Luque, JL.
2008a. Helmintos parasitos do pirarucu,
Arapaima gigas ( S c h i n z , 1 8 2 2 )
(Osteoglossiformes: Arapaimidae), no
rio Araguaia, estado de Mato Grosso,
B r a s i l . R e v i s t a B r a s i l e i r a d e
Parasitologia Veterinária, vol. 17, pp.
171-173.
Santos, CP, Gibson, DI, Tavares, LER &
Luque, JL. 2008b. Ch eck li st o f
Acanthocephala associated with the
fishes of Brazil. Zootaxa, vol. 1938, pp.
1-22.
Santos, CP, Moravec, F & Venturieri, R. 2008c.
Capillostrongyloides arapaimae sp. n.
(Nematoda: Capillariidae), a new
intestinal parasite of the arapaima
Arapaima gigas from the Brazilian
Am az on. Memórias do Instituto
Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 103, pp. 392-395.
Santos, CP & Moravec, F. 2009. Goezia
s p i n u l o s a ( N e m a t o d a :
Raphidascarididae), a pathogenic
pa ra site o f t he Arapaima gigas
(Osteichthyes). Folia Parasitologica
(Praha), vol. 56, pp. 55-63.
Serrano-Martínez, E, Tantaleán, MV, Leguía,
GP, Quispe, MH & Casas, GC. 2015.
Parásitos en Arapaima gigas de la
Amazonía Peruana según grupo etario.
Revista Investigaciones Veterinarias del
Perú, vol. 26, pp. 303-309.
65, pp. 1192-1202.
Mathews, PD, Mathews, DJP & Ismiño, OR.
2013. Parasitic infections in juveniles of
Arapaima gigas ( S c h i n z , 1 8 2 2 )
cultivated in the Peruvian Amazon.
Annals of Parasitology, vol. 59, pp. 43-
48.
Mathews, PD, Malheiros, AF, Vasquez, ND &
Chavez, MD. 2014. High Infestation by
Dawestrema cycloancistrioides in
Arapaima gigas Cultured in the Amazon
Region, Peru. Journal of Veterinary
th
Medicine, accessed in March 8 , 2016,
<http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jvm
/2014/245878/>
Moravec, F, Kohn, A & Fernandes, BMM,
1994. Two new species of the genus
Goezia, G. brasiliensis sp. n. and G.
b r e v i c a e c a s p . n . ( N e m a t o d a :
Anisakidae), from freshwater fishes in
Brazil. Folia Parasitologica, vol. 41, pp.
271–278.
Moravec, F. 1998. Nematodes of Freshwater
Fishes of the Neotropical Region,
Academia, Prague.
Morand, S & Poulin, R. 1998. Density, body
mass and parasite species richness of
terrestrial mammals. Evolutionary
Ecology, vol. 12, pp. 717–727.
Naylor, RL, Goldburg, RJ, Primavera, JH,
Kautsky, N, Beveridge, MCM, Clay, J,
Folke, C, Lubchenco, J, Mooney, H &
Troell, M. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on
world fish supplies. Nature, vol. 405, pp.
1017-1024.
Oliveira, EG, Pinheiro, AB, Oliveira, VQ,
Silva Junior, RMS, Moraes, MG, Rocha,
IRCB, Sousa, RRS & Costa, FHF. 2012.
Effects of stocking density on the
performance of juvenile pirarucu
(Arapaima gigas) in cages. Aquaculture,
vol. 370-371, pp. 96–101.
Pavanelli, GC, Eiras, JC & Takemoto, RM.
2008. Doença de peixes, profilaxia,
diagnóstico e tratamento. Eduem,
Maringá.
Poulin, R. 2007. Are there general laws in
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Silva et al.
231
Vol. 1. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow.
Timi, JT & Poulin, R. 2003. Parasite
community structure within and across
host populations of a marine pelagic
fish: how repeatable is it? International
Journal for Parasitology, vol. 33, pp.
1353-1362.
Tacon, AGJ & Silva, SS. 1997. Feed
preparation and feed management
strategies within semi-intensive fish
fa rming sy ste ms in the tropics .
Aquaculture, vol. 151, pp. 379-404.
Tavares-Dias, M. 2011. Piscicultura
continental no estado do Amapá:
diagnóstico e perspectivas. Boletim de
Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Embrapa
Amapá, vol. 81, pp. 1-38.
Thatcher, VE. 2006. Aquatic Biodiversity in
Latin America. Amazon Fish Parasites.
Received July 7, 2016.
Accepted September 1, 2016.
Neotropical Helminthology. Vol. 10, Nº2, jul-dic 2016 Helminth community structure of Arapaima gigas