(Siddiqi, 1960) in the same host and site. Also,
Furhmann (1909) renamed D. novaehollandiae
(Krefft, 1871) in the little grebe T. ruficollis (Pallas,
1764) from Australia. But Ryzhikov & Tolkacheva
(1981) synonymized D. novaehollandiae with D.
asper. So, the six species cited above have the
particularity that all of them are specialists in
grebes, and four of them were described in the same
host, T. ruficollis. This situation carries to a poor
known and confounding systematic status in the
family Dioecocestidae. Storer (2000) stated that
the Australian material needs checking. Fuhrmann
(1907) ranked all dioecious species in a new
family, Acoleinidae, whose type genus, Acoleus
Fuhrmann, 1899, shared with Dioecocestus some
features of interest, especially the absence of
external vaginal opening, arrangement of the
testicular mass, two layers of parenchymatic
muscular bands and the shape of the uterus.
Ransom (1909) amended the name of the family in
question as Acoleidae which brought together the
genera Acoleus Fuhrmann, 1899, Gyrocoelia
Fuhrmann, 1899, Dioecocestus Fuhrmann, 1900,
Diplophallus Fuhrmann, 1900 and Shipleya
Fuhrmann, 1908. Later, Southwell (1930)
relocated Dioecocestus, Shipleya and Gyrocoelia
into a new family, Dioecocestidae. Yamaguti
(1959) recognized the subfamily Gyrocoeliinae for
the genera Gyrocoelia, Shipleya and Infula Burt,
1939 and Tolkacheva (1979) raised the group to the
family level, Gyrocoeliidae.
From its original description by Fuhrmann (1900),
D. paronai was nevermore found from ibises. The
present authors looked for helminths in two species
of ibises from wetlands of Buenos Aires province
(MCH, LT and CH), the white-faced ibis Plegadis
chihi (Vieillot 1817)(n= 5) and the bared-faced
ibis Phimosus infuscatus (Lichtenstein, 1823) (n=
2) but did not found any species of tapeworms.
Digiani (2000) examined the digenean and cestode
fauna of P. chihi (n= 64) from several wetlands at
Buenos Aires province and recorded by the first
time Hymenolepis megalops (Nitzch in Creplin,
1829) (Cestoda, Hymenolepididae)(10.7%
prevalence). Georgiev and Vaucher (2000)
described Chimaerula bonai ( Cestoda,
Dilepididae) based on four specimens of Ph.
infuscatus from Paraguay (100% prevalence).
Martínez-Haro et al. (2012) recorded one
individual of Cyclustera ralli (Underwood et
Dronen, 1986) Bona 1994 (Cestoda, Dilepididae)
in one P. chihi from the state of Mexico. Scheer et
al. (2019) examined the helminth assemblages of
Ph. infuscatus from Southern Brazil, from twenty-
eight birds and cited the presence of
Megalacanthus sp. (Cestoda, Dilepididae)
(89.28% prevalence). None of the mentioned
authors recorded D. paronai in ibises. This fact,
along to the present finding in 32 of 38 R. rolland
(82.5% prevalence) suggest that the white-tufted
grebe is the natural host in Argentina. Storer (2000,
p. 20) emphasized that D. paronai represents an
exception in the host specificity of the members of
Dioecocestidae as specialists of grebes. The
present finding confirm that all dioecocestids are
grebe specialists. Moreover, based on criteria about
the levels of host specificity proposed by Palm &
Caira (2008), D. paronai would be a oioxenous
species, showing a high degree of specificity.
Fuhrmann supossed that the scolex unfortunately
was degraded in both of the worms he examined
(p.50: “Der Scolex war bei beiden Exemplaren
leider abgerissen”). Ryzhikov & Tolkacheva
(1978) on the basis of the scolex morphology
divided the genus Dioecocestus into four groups
and considered D. paronai belonging to the third
one: “scolex without rostellum or suckers”. Our
observations shown that really D. paronai has four
rudimentary suckers and so, it should be grouped
into the fourth morphological group: “scolex with
suckers but no rostellum”, along D. cablei from T.
ruficollis in India.
Few measurements were recorded in Furhmann´s
original description. The tapeworms of R. rolland
were larger than the Fuhrmann's specimens (110
mm vs 70mm –males- and 140mm vs 60 mm
–females-) . However the worms described here
agree in general terms with the original description.
The presence of a rudimentary scolex without
rostellum and hooks, arrangement of the testes into
a central mass, not divided in two fields, absence of
vagina opening, inner muscle bundles well
developed in two longitudinal layers, the structure
of the cirrus sac and the cirrus are similiar in our
material, all these features allow us to confirm the
specific status.
In respect to the distribution of D. paronai within
the host population, both the coefficient of
dispersion and the contagion parameter showed a
regular or underdispersed pattern (Morales & Pino,