image/svg+xmlEste artículo es publicado por la revista Neotropical Helminthology de la Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemática, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Lima, Perú auspiciado por la Asociación Peruana de Helmintología e Invertebrados Afines (APHIA). Este es un artículo de acceso abierto, distribuido bajo los términos de la licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0) [https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es] que permite el uso, distribución y reproducción en cualquier medio, siempre que la obra original sea debidamente citada de su fuente original.ISSN Versión impresa 2218-6425ISSN Versión Electrónica 1995-1043Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dic:123-132.ORIGINAL ARTICLE / ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL1Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA, Brasil.*Corresponding author: atjsouza15@gmail.comAmanda Karen Silva Jtineant: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7506-0794Daniel Brito Porto: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-7021José Celso de Oliveira Malta: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-21901*11Amanda Karen Silva Jtineant; Daniel Brito Porto & José Celso de Oliveira MaltaABSTRACTArgulus yawewitus sp. n. is described from pirarucu, Arapaima gigas (Shinz, 1822) from a fish farm in Northeast Brazil. The characteristics that distinguish it from other species are shape of the carapace, abdomen, respiratory areas, the ornamentation and morphology of the antena and antennule, the sexual dimorphism that distinguishes female from male, and the flag-like protrusions on the male's second and third pair of legs. Neotropical Helminthology123DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24039/rnh20221621481ARGULUS YAWEWITUS SP. N. (CRUSTACEA: BRANCHIURA) PARASITE OF ARAPAIMA GIGAS(SHINZ, 1822) (OSTEOGLOSSIFORMES: ARAPAIMIDAE) FROM BRAZILARGULUS YAWEWITUSN. SP. (CRUSTACEA: BRANCHIURA) PARÁSITO DE ARAPAIMA GIGAS(SHINZ, 1822) (OSTEOGLOSSIFORMES: ARAPAIMATIDAE) DE BRAZILDKeywords: fish ectoparasite – freshwater Argulidae – Argulusyawewitus sp. n. – South AmericaDDRESUMENArgulus yawewitusn. sp. se describe de pirarucu, Arapaima gigas(Shinz, 1822) de una piscifactoría en el noreste de Brasil. Las características que lo distinguen de otras especies son la forma del caparazón, abdomen, áreas respiratorias, la ornamentación y morfología de la antena, y anténula, el dimorfismo sexual que se acentúa entre hembra y macho, y las protuberancias en forma de bandera en el segundo y tercer par de patas del macho.Palabras clave: América del Sur – Argulidae de agua dulce –Argulusyawewitus n. sp. – ectoparásito de peces –morfologíaart. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134
image/svg+xml124Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dicINTRODUCTIONThe species of Branchiura are ectoparasite crustaceans of fish that live primarily on the outer surface of the body and the base of the fins of their hosts. Their larvae are free-living in at least one of their phases: in the last larval stage they are fixed in a host (Ringuelet, 1943). Few species of Argulus Müller, 1785 have been described from marine fish and scattered reports of Branchiura on tadpoles, salamanders and even alligators can be found (Ringuelet, 1943; Piasecki & Avenant-Oldewage, 2008).Branchiura species feed on blood, plasma, mucus, or epithelial cells (Ringuelet, 1943). In the species of the genus Argulusthe oral apparatus consists of two distinct parts united in their bases; the anterior part is formed by a fine point stylus. When not in use it is partially retracted into a sheath. Inside the stylet there is a duct that attaches to a poison gland, located on the bottom of this unit; this organ is similar to the buccal apparatus of the hemiptera and is used to pierce the fish epidermis for food purposes. This piece is called a pre-oral spine (Malta & Varella, 2009).The branchiurans have a significant economic importance due to the damage they cause to natural populations of fishes, debilitating adult hosts and generally killing young fish. These damages are increased in intensive crops given the high concentration of fish and small areas creating optimal conditions for the development of these and other parasites. In these environments, populations of Branchiura species increase rapidly and as the fish cannot escape the attacks, they become true pests (Kabata, 1970; Souza & Malta, 2018ab).A new species of Argulusis described from pirarucu, Arapaima gigas (Shinz, 1822) of a fish farm in Northeast Brazil.Branchiurans were carefully taken from fish captured with delicate tweezers. Eleven specimens of Argulusyawewitus n. sp. were collected on the surface of the A. gigasbody raised at the fish farm of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife and Pernambuco state, Brazil. The specimens were preserved in 90% ethyl alcohol and studied with the aid of stereo and light microscopes. Two specimens (1 male and 1 female) were cleared in lactic acid + water 1:1Drawings were made (with the aid of a drawing tube). Measurements were made with a micrometer eyepiece and given as means followed by the range in brackets and in millimeters. Five females and two males were deposited in the non-insect Invertebrate Collection of the National Research Institute of Amazonia (INPA), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil (INPA 2549 and INPA 2550).For the external ultrastructural analysis, two specimens, one male and one female, were selected, underwent post-fixation in 1% OsO 4(Osmium Tetroxide) during 3 h, followed by dehydration in an increasing series of ethanol from 80% ethanol to 100%, and then dried in a CO 2Critical Point device. then the Branchiura were carefully mounted on “stubs” (metallic aluminum), metallized with gold and analyzed under a Tescan scanning electron microscope VEGA 3 of the Laboratory of Animal Histology and Embryology at the Institute of Health and Animal Production in partnership with the Federal Rural University of the Amazon.Ethic aspects: This study followed and committed to all ethical aspects to be carried out. TaxonomyPhylum ArthropodaClass MaxillopodaSubclass BranchiuraOrder ArgulideaFamily Argulidae Genus ArgulusMüller O.F., 1785Argulus yawewitus sp. n. Material examined – Holotype adult female (INPA - CR 2549) from the body surface of Arapaima gigasin liquid medium from fish farms of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Brazil.Jtineant et al.MATERIAL AND METHODSRESULTSart. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134
image/svg+xml125Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dicAdult female (Fig. 1 - 4)Based on ten females the body shape is rounded (Figs 1 - 4) with paired incisions of antero-latera carapace to form a defined frontal region and comprising cephalon, four thoracic somites, and abdomen. Color in alcohol-fixed is light yellow with drawings formed by spots of light brown pigments in the carapace and dark brown in the abdomen. Total length (tl) 4.08-5.44 (4.69 ± 0.59); carapace length (cl) 3.45-4.59 (3.95 ± 0.48), carapace width (cw) 3.06-4.89 (3.99 ± 0.81). Relations between total length / carapace length (tl / cl) 1.09-1.33 (1.2 ± 0.07). Cephalon longer than wide, bearing pair of compound eyes and nauplius eye. Compound eye bean-shaped with medial cleft on interior margin. Nauplius eye composed of three ocelli, two ocelli facing anteriorly and one facing posteriorly.Argulus yawewitussp. n. parasitic of Arapaima gigasABCADA200µ1mmFigure 1. (A – F). A - Female of Argulus yawewitussp. n. B – Antenna and Antenula; C and D – Cephalic Spine; E – Sucker; F – support rods Second Maxilla.art. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134
image/svg+xml126A pair of separate interocular rods originates near the margin anterior of cephalon and extend towards and pass between compound eyes going to the anterior margin of the first somite of the cephalothorax. Carapace longer than wide, posterior margin fully covers all legs and exceeds half of abdomen length. Suckers partially visible in dorsal view. Lateral lobes broadly rounded, posteriorly separated by broad sinus 1/3 length of carapace. Abdomen wider than short, length 0.54-0.85 (0.71 ± 0.11) and width 0.93-1,14(0.99 ± 0.09); ratio total length / length of the abdomen (tl /la) 5.75 - 8.96 (6.74 ± 1.34), but somewhat variable between paratypes in length-to-width ratio ranging from 0.54-0.81. Widely rounded abdominal lobes; rami furcal small, located next to the midline. Small and orbicular spermatheca. The anal sinus about a quarter of the length of the abdomen. Light yellow colored dorsal surface with light yellow markings.EggsEggsCarapaceABCDThoraxEFThoraxAbdomen50µ100µ100µ200µ50µ100µFigure 2.(A – F): A and B - Female of Argulus yawewitussp. n., detail of eggs on the carapace; C and D – First legs; E – Thorax and abdomen; and F – Natatory lobule fourth pair of legs.Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dicJtineant et al.art. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134
image/svg+xml127Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dicVentral surface of the cephalic region and anterior part of the carapace ornamented with regularly arranged spines of similar size up to the height of the first pair of legs. Paired respiratory areas on ventral surface of lobes; anterior respiratory area small and circular to ovoid; posterior respiratory area with 4 indentations on internal margin. Thorax indistinctly 4-segmented, with distinctive light brown pigment spots, distended with eggs, ventral surface ornamented with scales and dorsal surface smooth (Fig. 2E) .First antenna (Fig. 1B and 4A) comprising 2 sections; stout 2-segmented proximal section possessing large spines; slender distal section with setae. First segment bearing a stout, large, Argulus yawewitussp. n. parasitic of Arapaima gigas12ABCDEF100µ20µ20µ50µ20µ20µFigure 3.A - Female of Argulus yawewitussp. n., mouth tube and second maxillae; B – Pre-oral papila; C – 1 mouth tube and 2 second maxillae; D – second maxilla basis; E – Detail of the ornamentation of the second maxillae; and F –.Scales of second maxilla.art. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134
image/svg+xml128posterior, slightly incurved spine; 2nd segment massive, without medial spine, large hook-like terminal spine and anterior spine, lacking hook. Second antenna (Fig. 1B and 4A) 5-segmented, fleshy. First 2 segments larger; remaining 3 thin, cylindrical; basal segment bears posterior spine. First segment bearing large, pointed posterior spine, a tuft of setae on rounded protrusion and terminally a large protrusion with three apical setae. Second segment short, approximately half of the first with a tuft of setae. Third segment the longest with nine thin setae. Forth segment without ornamentation. Fifth segment with three terminal spines.First maxilla forming large suction cup. Support rods composed of two sclerites of a rectangular shape (Fig. 1E and F). Anterolateral portion of suction cup with a thin membrane. Second maxilla 5-sgemented. Basal segment subtriangular with three rectangular teeth broad and spatulate, basal nodule with three simple setae. Second segment with pectinate scales in the mid-posterior portion. Third segment smaller than the second with two conical spines distally. Fourth flat segment, two thirds of the length of the third segment. Fifth segment with two claw-shaped terminal spines and a projection. mRetractile pre-oral spine elongated located midway between first maxilla; tip extending to midway between post-antennal spine when retracted; ventral surface of spine without scales. Mouth tube less than twice as long as broad, with few scales scattered around base; denticulate mandibles visible within mouth tube. Pair of accessory spines located between the second maxilla (Fig. 3 - A and C).Pair of thoracic spines located between the first pair of legs. First to 4th pairs of legs biramous and of near equal size; sympods indistinctly 2-segmented. Flagellum present on 1st and 2nd legs; extending medially from origin on dorsal surface at base of exopod; both rami and flagella armed with 2 rows of plumose setae. Natatory lobe on 4th leg produced laterally. Simple scales present on natatory legs (Fig. 2 - F).ABCDFigure 4. Light microscopy photo female of Argulus yawewitussp. n. A – Antenna and antennule; B – natatory flagellum of the first and second pair of legs; C - eggs in the carapace; and D – forth legs.Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dicJtineant et al.art. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134
image/svg+xml129Adult male (Fig. 5)Based on ten males (INPA - CR 2550). Body shape rounded (Fig 5AB) with paired incisions of antero-latera carapace to form defined frontal region and comprising cephalon, four thoracic somites, and abdomen, similar to that of female. Total length (tl) 3,6 - 3,99 (3,7 ± 0,16) mm, about 21% smaller than female (Figura 5). Dorsal surface of yellow color with light brown designs, softer than in females. Elliptical carapace, slightly longer than wide. Carapace length (cl) 2,61 - 3,21 (2,9 ± 0,22). Total length / carapace length ratio (tl / lc) 1,2 - 1,4 (1,3 ± 0,08).Thorax indistinctly 4-segmented, smaller, narrower and less prominent than the female's, with few light brown pigment spots. Abdomen sub-oval, lobes tapering to bluntly rounded tips, separated by sinus 1/6 length of abdomen; furcal rami small, located adjacent to midline at base of anal sinus; paired testes oval. Dorsally few light brown pigment spots. Cephalic appendages and first pairs of legs like those of female. Second to fourth pairs of legs modified by accessory copulatory structures. Second leg bearing two cup-shaped covered by simple scales on posterior face of protopod. Third leg bearing two cup-shaped covered by simple scales on anterior face of protopod and two cup-shaped sockets on posterior face located directly thabove peg on anterior surface of basis of 4 leg. Anterior surface of basis of fourth leg bearing peg-like structure and posterior natatory lobes fringed with plumose setae. Attachment area: body surface, fin base, gills and oral cavities.Etymology. In the Amazon, the Branchiura are known by the fishing community as small ray, the specific name, yawewitusderived from the “yawewit” is the Tupi, brazilian indigenous language word for ray.ABCDTescles500µ200µ200µ200µ1Figure 5. A - Male of Argulus yawewitussp. n.; B - Antenna and antennule; C – Legs; D – Testicles, 1(Copulatory organ accessory).Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dicArgulus yawewitussp. n. parasitic of Arapaima gigasart. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134
image/svg+xml130DISCUSSIONFor Brazil, 13 species ofArgulusare cited: A. nattereriHeller, 1857; A. elongatusHeller, 1857; A. salmineiKrøyer, 1863; A. paulensisWilson, 1924; A. carteriCunnington, 1931; A. multicolorSteckoven, 1937; A. pestiferRinguelet, 1948; A. juparanaensisLemos de Castro, 1950; A. spinulosusSilva, 1980; A. amazonicusMalta & Santos-Silva, 1989; A. chicomendesiMalta & Varella, 2000; A. ybatecobeSouza, Porto & Malta, 2017; A. celioiSouza, Porto & Malta, 2018. For Amazônia six species: A. multicolor, A. pestifer, A. juparanaensis, A. amazonicus, A. chicomendesi, A. ybatecobe, and A. celioi. Argulus yawewitussp. n. is the second species of Arguluscited for A. gigas, the first was A. chicomendesi. The morphology of A. yawewitus sp. n. resembles A. flavescensWilson, 1916 in its pigmentation pattern, size and shape of the carapace, eggs distribution in the carapace lobes, and ornamentation of the second maxilla basal nodule. However, whereas in A. flavescensthe accessory and post maxillary spines are conical, in A. yawewitus n. sp. they are rectangular teeth with rounded edges similar to A. striatusCunnington, 1913. Ventral surface of the cephalic region and anterior part of the carapace ornamented with regularly arranged spines, to the height of the first pair of legs, similar to A. vittatusRafinesque-Schmaltz 1814, A. angusticepsCunnington, 1913 and A. exiguusCunnington 1913. The first antenna is like A. fryeri.According to World Register of Marine Species (WORMS) there are 159 Argulus species with 17 synonymised species (Walter & Boxshall, 2021). Except for A. japonicusThiele, 1900 originally from Asia, but spread to all continents of the world except Antarctica. There are 152 Branchiura species in the world: four in Australia and Oceania, eleven in Europe, 28 in South America, 35 in Africa, 37 in Asia and 47 in North America (Neethling & Avenant-Oldewage, 2016).The suction cups, or so-called sucking disks, develop from the first maxillae on each side of the preoral sting. They have a flat rim covered by a chitinous exoskeleton with thickenings like ribs radiating outward. These ribs are variously broken up into segments, which are characteristic for a given species. They may be a series of long or short rods, segments simulating imbricate plates, or an elongate segment followed by a series of overlapping plates. The number of support rods of first maxilla varies only slightly for a given species. They are used for identification purposes (Meehan, 1940).The number of support rods of first maxilla in the Argulusspecies ranges from two to 35 sclerites. Argulus melanostictusWilson, 1935 from the Pacific Ocean collected in the United States and Thailand is the species that has the highest number of sclerites ranges from 33-35 (Meehan 1940; Wilson, 1944). In most species the number of sclerites ranges from 3 to 21. The minimum number of sclerites is two and was found in two North American species:A. appendiculosusWilson, 1907 and A. americanusWilson, 1902 (Wilson, 1904). Four species of South America: A. violaceusThomsen, 1925; A. pestiferRinguelet, 1948; A. moratoiSouza, Porto & Malta 2019; A. ventanensis Tanzola & Villegas-Ojeda, 2017 (Thomsen, 1925; Ringuelet, 1948; Souza & Malta, 2018ab; Souza et al.,2019; Tanzola & Villegas-Ojeda, 2017). And no species from Africa has only two sclerites on the support rods. Argulus yawewitus sp.n. is the fifth species ofArgulus that has the minimum number (2) of support rods of the first maxilla. They are composed of two sclerites of a rectangular shape. Second to fourth pairs of legs modified by accessory copulatory structures. Second leg bearing two cup-shaped covered by simples scales on posterior face of protopod. Third leg bearing two cup-shaped covered by simples scales on anterior face of protopod and two cup-shaped sockets on posterior face located directly above peg thon anterior surface of basis of 4 leg. Anterior surface of basis of fourth leg bearing peg-like structure and posterior natatory lobes fringed with plumose setae. Second to fourth pairs of legs modified by accessory copulatory structures. Second leg bearing two cup-shaped covered by simples scales on posterior face of protopod. Third leg bearing two cup-shaped covered by simples scales on Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dicJtineant et al.art. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134
image/svg+xml131anterior face of protopod and two cup-shaped sockets on posterior face located directly above peg thon anterior surface of basis of 4 leg. Anterior surface of basis of fourth leg bearing peg-like structure and posterior natatory lobes fringed with plumose setae. In the male, chitinous prominences with thorns on the legs resemble A. giordaniiBrian, 1959. The accessory sexual structures, flag-like protrusions, present on legs 2 and 3 also occurred in two other species of Argulus, were found in A ernstiWeibezahn & Cobo, 1964 from Venezuela, two on the second and two on the third pair of legs, still with different shapes (Weibezahn & Cobo, 1964).Argulus yawewitus sp. n. is a unique species, among its peculiarities we can mention: ornamentation of antennas 1 and 2, rods supporting the first maxilla, second maxilla, ornamentation of the buccal cone, accessory and post-maxillary spines and ornamentation of the male's legs.Argulus yawewitus sp. n. may easily be distinguished from other species of Argulusby a combination of the following characters: the format and ornamentation of the first and second antennas position of the smaller respiratory area is anterior to the larger one and (2) the ribs of the suction cups are composed of 9 to 11 imbricated plates only. In Wilson's (1904) account, there are 22 species of Argulusincluding A. indicuswith their respiratory areas arranged as in A. quadristriatus. Among the seven species of Argulusknown to occur in India, A. giganteusand A. indicushave this type of respiratory areas. In A. kurafuguand A. scutiformisfrom Japanese fishes, Yamaguti & Yamasu (1959) reported such an arrangement of the respiratory areas. Of the above cited species, only A. melanostictus, A. pugettensis, A. niger) A. melanostictusand A. giganteushave the arrangement of the respiratory areas combined with the fact that the ribs of the suction cups are exclusively formed of imbricated plates, as in the present species. However, they differ from A. quadristriatusin the much greater number of these plates in each rib, viz., 30 in A. melanostictus. The authors thank Maria do Carmo Figueiredo Soares for collecting and donating the described specimens of Branchiura. To Matthew Jtineant for the English review. And to the Laboratory of Animal Histology and Embryology at the Institute of Health and Animal Production in partnership with the Federal Rural University of the Amazon, for permission to use the electron microscope for ultrastructural visualization of the specimens described herein.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSKabata, Z. 1970. Diseases of fiches. Crustacea as enemies of fiches. Jersey City. T.F.H. Publications. 171p.Meehan, OL. 1940. A review of the parasitic Crustacea of the genus Argulusin the collections of the United States National Museum. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, vol. 88 (3087), pp. 459-522. Neethling, LAM & Avenant-Oldewage, A. 2016. Branchiura - A compendium of the geographical distribution and a summary of their biology.Crustaceana, vol. 89, pp. 1243-1446. Malta, JCO & Varella, AMB. 2009. A Fauna de Arthropodes da Reserva Florestal Ducke – Estado atual do conhecimento taxonômico e biológico. Ed. INPA. 1, pp. 17-20.Piasecki, W & Avenant-Oldewage, A. 2008. Diseases caused by Crustacea. In: Eiras, J.C.; Segner, H.; Wahli, T.; Kapoor, B.G. (Eds.). Fish Diseases. Science Publishers, Enfield (NH). pp. 1115–1200.Ringuelet, R. 1943. Revision de los Argúlidos argentinos (Crustacea, Branchiura): con el catálogo de las especies neotropicales. Revista del Museo de la Plata. Sección Zoología, vol. 3, pp. 43-99. Souza, AKS & Malta, JCO. 2018a. Argulus celioi n. sp. Branchiura fish parasite (Maxillopoda: Argulidae) from the Xingu River, Brazil. Scholars Journal of Research in Agriculture and Biology, vol.3, pp.166-172.Souza, AKS & Malta, JCO. 2018b. A new species of Branchiura (Crustacea: Maxillopoda) fish parasite from the brazilian Amazon.Neotropical Helminthology, vol.12, pp. 187-191.BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dicArgulus yawewitussp. n. parasitic of Arapaima gigasart. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134
image/svg+xml132Souza, AKS, Porto, DB & Malta, JCO. 2009. A new species of Argulus,a fish parasite from the Brazilian Amazon (Crustacea, Branchiura). Spixiana, vol. 42, pp. 7-14.Tanzola, RR & Villegas-Ojeda, MA. 2017. Argulus ventanensis sp. n. (Crustacea, Branchiura) parasite of Hypsiboas pulchellus tadpoles (Anura, Hylidae). Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences,vol. 12, pp. 218-226. Thomsen, R. 1925. Argulus violaceus nov. spec., cangrejo parásito del bagre. Physis, Buenos Aires, vol. 8, pp.185-198.Yamaguti, S & Yamasu, T. 1959. Parasitic copepods from fishes of Japan with descriptions of 26 new species and remarks on two known species.Biological Journal of Okayama University, vol. 5, pp. 89–165.Walter, TC & Boxshall, G. 2021. World of Copepods database. Argulidae Leach, 1819.http://marinespecies.org/copepoda/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=104070Weibezahn, FH & Cobo, T. 1964. Seis argulidos (Crustacea: Branchiura) parásitos de peces dulceacuícolas en Venezuela, con descripción de una nueva especie del géneroArgulus. Acta Biologica Venezuelica, vol. 4, pp. 119-144.Wilson, CB. 1904. A new species of Argulus. With a more complete account of two species already described. Proceedings of United States of National Museum, vol. 27, pp. 635-742.Wilson, CB. 1944. Parasitic copepods in the United States National Museum. Bulletin of the United States National Museum. vol. 94, pp. 529-582.Received June 10, 2022.Accepted September 6, 2022.Neotropical Helminthology, 2022, 16(2), jul-dicJtineant et al.art. 1=10-24art. 2=26-41Art 3 =42-51art. 4=52-59art. 5=60-65art 6=66-79art. 7=80-91art 8 =92-100art 9=102-111nota 1=112-116nota 2=118-123 rev =124-134