Cystic echinococcosis public health problem in Latin America Ferreira, C & Irabedra, P.
56
as the only tool to tackle the problem. In countries
like Uruguay, implementation of that strategy leaves
out broad sectors for various reasons.
We cite just two reasons to illustrate that : economic
and geographical. When dog owners have to
pay for the deparasitation service, the people or
communities that cannot afford it will obviously
not comply. The other cause of failure is the poor
accessibility in vast areas of the American continent
due to geographical hurdles.
Furthermore, in spite of the unquestionable value
of mathematical models (Roberts et al., 1986), their
application in real life has often failed to provide the
results expected , particularly in a complex health/
disease process involves many biological, ecological,
social and economic factors.
The control program currently implemented in
Uruguay is based on a “risk-focused approach”.
Surveys conducted in the framework of such
programs in small villages and extremely poor
urban areas, where no targeted praziquantel had
been administered, or where anti-helmintic dosing
had been sporadic or irregular, coproantigen tests
were positive for E. granulosus in 4 % of the dogs,
and as high as 7 % in the case of dogs labeled as
“offal eaters”. Those groups represent true sources
of infection (nodes) (Comisión Nacional Honoraria
de Zoonosis, unpublished data).
These values are consistent with those found in rural
areas where targeted anti-helmintic dosing of dogs
is conducted.
The new strategy tries to address those issues by
reinforcing several lines of action simultaneously
and synergistically:
Epidemiological re-definition, reviewing,
redesigning and increasing coverage of
administration of praziquantel to dogs,
adapting to each area’s epidemiological status,
especially targeting the sources of infection as
a priority.
Detection of individuals with asymptomatic
liver hydatic cysts through ultrasound screening
(Perdomo et al., 1990). The use of serology
initially in countries with high infection rates is
not to be excluded; that issue should be decided
based on the specific countrys characteristics,
•
•
applying a comprehensive vision of health .
Development and/or promotion of programs
for the responsible possession of dogs; one of the
key components must be controlling the size of
dog populations through surgical sterilization;
there is evidence showing that the technique
is time sustainable and widely accepted by the
population.
Emphasizing the educational component,
prioritizing the direct interventions on the
field, while promoting the tasks required for an
early detection of hydatic cysts. However, the
relevance of other strategies, such as curricular
education should not be disregarded.
Commitment of stakeholders at all stages of
implementation of the program.
Finally, cooperation among the countries in the
region should be seen as a key instrument to improve
institutional capacities in the pursuit of common
development goals.
In Resolution 7, the XII Inter-American Ministerial
Meeting on Health and Agriculture (RIMSA XII)
held in 2001 highlights cystic echinococcosis as
a significant Public Health problem, urging the
countries to formulate plans of action and strategies
aimed at eliminating the disease in the Southern
Cone, the Andean Area and other sub-regions of
the Americas.
In this context 2007 Peru and Uruguay launched
a Technical Cooperation Project for the Prevention
and Control of Cystic Echinococcosis in Peru. The
project was developed in the framework of the
strategy and vision of support to the initiatives for
the control of this zoonosis in the South American
countries, as declared by the country members of
the Southern Cone Sub Regional Project for the
Control and Surveillance of Hydatidosis, with
the technical cooperation of the Pan American
Health Organization/ World Health Organization
(PAHO/WHO).
This cooperation project opens a very important
pathway for the exchange of experiences and
technology “made in” Latin America; it intends to
be comprehensive, more efficient and effective
than past programs, and inexpensive, allowing
for the two countries’ simultaneous and synergic
development. An example of such cooperation is
the exchange agreed in relation with the diagnosis
•
•
•